Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327041›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Fertility Adjustment Scale.

Joana Romeiro, Paulo Nogueira, Sílvia Caldeira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joana RomeiroInstitute of Health Sciences, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Palma de Cima, Catholic University of Portugal, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2183
Paulo NogueiraFaculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Preventiva e Saúde Pública, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8316-5035
Sílvia CaldeiraInstitute of Health Sciences, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Palma de Cima, Catholic University of Portugal, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9804-2297
Universidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. UIDB/04279/2020NANDA-International, Inc. Foundation Grant Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need to provide healthcare professionals and midwives with validated tools as to improve fertility adjustment and promote well-being of couples with infertility. The purpose of this study was to test validity of the Fertility Adjustment Scale among people undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. A cross-sectional and methodological study was conducted, and a total of 104 Portuguese adults undergoing fertility treatment were recruited through fertility-related websites. The Fertility Adjustment Scale was administered along with the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire and the Resilience Scale for adults as a measure of concurrent validity. Scores revealed the sample's lack of adjustment to fertility. A significant correlation with measures of resilience provided evidence of convergent validity. There was a significant association of fertility adjustment with time of consultation and the cause of infertility. A Fertility Adjustment Scale with six items is a reliable tool that offers early recognition of patients' difficulties in adaptation to fertility problems during assisted reproductive techniques, which could be beneficial in not only an early recognition of healthcare intervention but of a more individualized approach to such patients.

Indexed as

adjustmentassisted reproductive techniquesinfertilityvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID35327041
PMCPMC8954057
OpenAlexW4220686751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.