ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Global Health Governance and Health Equity in the Context of COVID-19: A Scoping Review.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understandings and practices of solidarity in global health: a scoping review of the literature.Globalization and health · 2026Article
- Private capital in a public field: a qualitative study of philanthropic influence in Germany's global health governance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Governance in Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Global Health Governance During COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Overview of global governance, capacity, and health systems implication of pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response: A narrative review and descriptive analysis of open-source data.Global health & medicine · 2025Review
- The complexity of addressing equity in COVID-19-related global health governance and population health research priorities in Canada: a multilevel qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The Use of Contact Tracing Technologies for Infection Prevention and Control Purposes in Nosocomial Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.Infectious disease reports · 2024Review
- COVID-19 ethics: unique aspects and a review as of early 2024.Monash bioethics review · 2024Review
- World health order.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Vulnerability, social value and the equitable sharing of benefits from research: beyond the placebo and access debates.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- COVID-19-related global health governance and population health priorities for health equity in G20 countries: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Global health governance performance during Covid-19, what needs to be changed? a delphi survey study.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Ethical principles for infodemiology and infoveillance studies concerning infodemic management on social media.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth equity is an important aspect of responsible governance. COVID-19 exposed existing shortfalls of Global Health Governance (GHG). A considerable amount of related literature is produced. This scoping review aims at mapping the present knowledge and at identifying research gaps.
methodsThis scoping review is based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's guideline for standardized methods and PRISMA-ScR guidelines for reporting. Documents published from December 2019 to October 2021 were searched using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, World cat, and WHO-Global Index Medicus. Two reviewers screened and reviewed eligible studies in three stages: duplicates identification and elimination, title and abstract screening, and full-text assessment. Data was charted and results were classified into conceptual categories. Analysis was done in three stages: open descriptive coding, focused thematic analysis, and frequency, commonality and significance analysis.
resultsforty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Areas of research were grouped into seven themes: "human rights and inequities", "solidarity, collaboration and partnership", "GHG structure change", "political and economic power and finance", "approaches to address inequity", "law and regulations", and "private investment and public-private partnerships (PPPs) in GHG". The highest number of papers were in the first theme, "human rights and inequities". However, the themes are interrelated. Authors who contributed to research were mostly affiliated to developed countries indicating a gap in knowledge and expertise in developing countries.
conclusionThrough this scoping review we found that the seven themes are interconnected. Disciplinary collaboration in research relating GHG to health inequities is solicited. Collaboration in research, information sharing, and research capacity development are in needed in developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.