Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326999›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Information Usage and Compliance with Preventive Behaviors for COVID-19: A Longitudinal Study with Data from the JACSIS 2020/JASTIS 2021.

Taro Kusama, Sakura Kiuchi, Kenji Takeuchi, Takaaki Ikeda, Noriko Nakazawa, Anna Kinugawa, Ken Osaka, Takahiro Tabuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Preventive Behaviors and Information Sources during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Taro KusamaDivision for Regional Community Development, Liaison Center for Innovative Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-4484
Sakura KiuchiDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Kenji TakeuchiDivision for Regional Community Development, Liaison Center for Innovative Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8769-8955
Takaaki IkedaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-4492
Noriko NakazawaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Anna KinugawaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Ken OsakaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Takahiro TabuchiCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-3125

Funding

Health Labor Sciences Research Grant 19FA1005;19FG2001; 19FA1012Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grants 7H03589,19K10671,19K10446,18H03107, 18H03062, 19H03860, 21H04856JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists 19K19439Research Support Program to Apply the Wisdom of the University to tackle COVID-19 Related Emergency Problems N/Athe Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) 2033648University of Tsukuba N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of different types of information sources on individual preventive behaviors remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the associations between individual information usage to obtain information about COVID-19 and compliance with preventive behaviors. This longitudinal study was based on an Internet survey conducted in August−September 2020 and February 2021. We used compliance with four preventive behaviors for COVID-19, “wearing a mask”, “ventilation”, “social distancing”, and “avoiding crowds” as outcome variables, and 20 types of information sources based on people or institutions (Medical worker, Government, etc.) and media (TV news, Twitter, etc.) as predictors. Absolute differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using generalized estimating equations adjusted for possible confounders. Among the 18,151 participants aged 20−79, the mean age was 51.7 (SD = 15.9) in 2020, and 51.3% were male. In total, compliance with “wearing a mask”, “ventilation”, “social distancing”, and “avoiding crowds” was seen in 86.2%, 46.9%, 45.4%, and 62.6% of individuals in 2020, and 89.3%, 38.2%, 47.2%, and 61.6% of individuals in 2021, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, “medical workers”, “professionals”, “the government”, “Twitter”, “news websites”, and “TV news” were positively associated with compliance with two or more preventive behaviors (p < 0.05). The type of information source may play an important role in providing information for COVID-19 prevention.

Indexed as

COVID-19longitudinalmediapreventive behavior

Identifiers

PMID35326999
PMCPMC8954039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.