Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326979›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Assessment of the Quality of Saudi Patient Information Leaflets (PILs) Based on the Accuracy of Physical Description and Frequency of Solid Dosage Forms.

Turki Al Hagbani, Dareen Alrdaian, Reem Q Alshammari, Ghaliah Alshammary, Mukhtar Ansari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Turki Al HagbaniDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6595-3097
Dareen AlrdaianDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Reem Q AlshammariDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Ghaliah AlshammaryDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.
Mukhtar AnsariDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail 81442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-6356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical description of dosage forms is one of the most important considerations in avoiding patient confusion and minimizing medication errors. This study aimed to determine the quality and accuracy of the physical descriptions in patient information leaflets (PILs). This cross-sectional study constituted a total of 200 drugs and PILs that were randomly selected, by pharmacy students, from Al-Dawaa community pharmacies in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia, from January 2021 to July 2021. The drugs and PILs were thoroughly evaluated in accordance with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) guidelines for PILs. The accuracy screening of the total solid dosage forms (capsules + tablets) revealed that 45% showed complete accuracy and compliance, 1.5% showed poor accuracy and compliance, and 53% showed no accuracy and no compliance with the GCC guidelines and the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) guidelines. In the frequency test, color, shape, and imprints accounted for 95.6%, 79.1%, and 73.6%, respectively. However, the size of the dosage form was the least (2.2%) used physical description feature. These findings recommend pharmaceutical companies to pay more attention to the written physical description in their PILs. Additionally, the process of PIL approval should be optimized, evaluated, and updated systematically to ensure that they contain the essential information.

Indexed as

colorcommunity pharmaciespatient information leafletsphysical descriptionquality

Identifiers

PMID35326979
PMCPMC8948781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.