Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326973›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on Balance and Functional Mobility in the Stroke Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jaya Shanker Tedla, Kumar Gular, Ravi Shankar Reddy, Arthur de Sá Ferreira, Erika Carvalho Rodrigues, Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi, Giles Gyer, Devika Rani Sangadala, Mohammed Qasheesh, Rakesh Krishna Kovela and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05916885 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Short-intensity Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy on Hand Function in Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsHemorrhagic Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, RehabilitationArmsshort-intensity modified CIMT and conventional therapy, conventional therapy alone
NCT06358976 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Anti-spastic Splint With Added Focal Muscle Vibration (FMV) in Decreasing Hand Spasticity and Improving Hand Functionality Among Individuals With Chronic Stroke: a Pilot Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArab American University (Palestine)Ran2024 to 2024Enrolled48ConditionsSpasticity as Sequela of StrokeArmsVibration plus anti-spastic hand splint, Anti-spastic hand splint, Vibration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in Stroke Neurorehabilitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jaya Shanker TedlaDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-4227
Kumar GularDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Ravi Shankar ReddyDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-0585
Arthur de Sá FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, University Center Augusto Motta UNISUAM, Rio de Janeiro 21032-060, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-2002
Erika Carvalho RodriguesPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, University Center Augusto Motta UNISUAM, Rio de Janeiro 21032-060, Brazil.
Venkata Nagaraj KakaraparthiDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Giles GyerThe London College of Osteopathic Medicine, London NW1 6QH, UK.
Devika Rani SangadalaDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed QasheeshDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Rakesh Krishna KovelaDepartment of Neuro Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha 442001, Maharastra, India.
Gopal NambiGopal Nambi, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4203-5506
King Khalid University · SAUniversity Center Augusto Motta · BRDatta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research · INJazan University · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAThe London College · GB

Funding

King Khalid University R.G.P.1/52/42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is one of the most popular treatments for enhancing upper and lower extremity motor activities and participation in patients following a stroke. However, the effect of CIMT on balance is unclear and needs further clarification. The aim of this research was to estimate the effect of CIMT on balance and functional mobility in patients after stroke. After reviewing 161 studies from search engines including Google Scholar, EBSCO, PubMed, PEDro, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science, we included eight randomized controlled trials (RCT) in this study. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was verified using PEDro scoring. This systematic review showed positive effects of CIMT on balance in three studies and similar effects in five studies when compared to the control interventions such as neuro developmental treatment, modified forced-use therapy and conventional physical therapy. Furthermore, a meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant effect size by a standardized mean difference of 0.51 (P = 0.01), showing that the groups who received CIMT had improved more than the control groups. However, the meta-analysis results for functional mobility were statistically insignificant, with an effect size of -4.18 (P = 0.16), indicating that the functional mobility improvements in the investigated groups were not greater than the control group. This study's findings demonstrated the superior effects of CIMT on balance; however, the effect size analysis of functional mobility was statistically insignificant. These findings indicate that CIMT interventions can improve balance-related motor function better than neuro developmental treatment, modified forced-use therapy and conventional physical therapy in patients after a stroke.

Indexed as

balanceconstraint-induced movement therapyfunctional mobilitystroke

Identifiers

PMID35326973
PMCPMC8949312
OpenAlexW4220707302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.