Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326916›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Healthcare Workers' Knowledge and Perception of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study.

Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Mohammadjavad Ashrafi Mahabadi, Wubshet Tesfaye, Kesavan Rajasekharan Nayar, Vijay Kumar Chattu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akshaya Srikanth BhagavathulaInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 17666, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-7808
Mohammadjavad Ashrafi MahabadiFaculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14665-354, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4109-0594
Wubshet TesfayeSydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Kesavan Rajasekharan NayarGlobal Institute of Public Health, Ananthapuri Hospitals and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram 695024, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4203-1959
Vijay Kumar ChattuSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9840-8335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In late November 2021, a new SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern (VOC) named Omicron (initially named B.1.1.529) was first detected in South Africa. The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant became globally dominant, and the currently available COVID-19 vaccines showed less protection against this variant. This study aimed to investigate healthcare workers' (HCWs) knowledge and perceptions about the novel SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. A cross-sectional anonymous electronic survey concerning the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was conducted among HCWs during the second week of January 2022. The survey instrument was distributed through social media among HCWs to explore awareness (2 items), knowledge (10 items), source of information (1 item), and perceptions (10 items). Respondents who answered ≥80% of the items correctly were considered as having good knowledge and perception. A total of 940 of the 1054 HCW participants completed the survey (response rate: 89.1%); they had a mean age of 31.2 ± 11.2 years, most were doctors (45.7%), and most were from Asia (64.3%). All the participants were aware of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (100%). Only 36.3% attended lectures/discussions about Omicron and used news media to obtain information. Only a quarter of the HCWs demonstrated good knowledge (24.3%,

Indexed as

attitudeawarenessCOVID-19health professionalsknowledgeOmicronperceptionspreventionSARS-CoV-2survey

Identifiers

PMID35326916
PMCPMC8951382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.