ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
COVID-19 Vaccination-Related Sentiments Analysis: A Case Study Using Worldwide Twitter Dataset.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing patient perceptions of off-label cannabidiol use for insomnia through sentiment analysis.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Exploring Topics, Emotions, and Sentiments in Health Organization Posts and Public Responses on Instagram: Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024Review
- Validating part of the social media infodemic listening conceptual framework using structural equation modelling.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Political context of the European vaccine debate on Twitter.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Strategies and Trends in COVID-19 Vaccination Delivery: What We Learn and What We May Use for the Future.Vaccines · 2023Article
- A Review on Electronic Health Record Text-Mining for Biomedical Name Entity Recognition in Healthcare Domain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Applications of Social Media and Digital Technologies in COVID-19 Vaccination: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Volatility of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: sentiment analysis conducted in Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Sentiment analysis of Indonesian datasets based on a hybrid deep-learning strategy.Journal of big data · 2023Article
- Automatically detecting and understanding the perception of COVID-19 vaccination: a middle east case study.Social network analysis and mining · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global health crisis, resulting in endless efforts to reduce infections, fatalities, and therapies to mitigate its after-effects. Currently, large and fast-paced vaccination campaigns are in the process to reduce COVID-19 infection and fatality risks. Despite recommendations from governments and medical experts, people show conceptions and perceptions regarding vaccination risks and share their views on social media platforms. Such opinions can be analyzed to determine social trends and devise policies to increase vaccination acceptance. In this regard, this study proposes a methodology for analyzing the global perceptions and perspectives towards COVID-19 vaccination using a worldwide Twitter dataset. The study relies on two techniques to analyze the sentiments: natural language processing and machine learning. To evaluate the performance of the different lexicon-based methods, different machine and deep learning models are studied. In addition, for sentiment classification, the proposed ensemble model named long short-term memory-gated recurrent neural network (LSTM-GRNN) is a combination of LSTM, gated recurrent unit, and recurrent neural networks. Results suggest that the TextBlob shows better results as compared to VADER and AFINN. The proposed LSTM-GRNN shows superior performance with a 95% accuracy and outperforms both machine and deep learning models. Performance analysis with state-of-the-art models proves the significance of the LSTM-GRNN for sentiment analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.