Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326872›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Systematic Review on Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Vancomycin Loading Dose in Critically Ill Patients.

Abdul Haseeb, Mayyasah Khalid Alqurashi, Areej Sultan Althaqafi, Jumana Majdi Alsharif, Hani Saleh Faidah, Mashael Bushyah, Amal F Alotaibi, Mahmoud Essam Elrggal, Ahmad Jamal Mahrous, Safa S Almarzoky Abuhussain and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Abdul HaseebDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2455-5054
Mayyasah Khalid AlqurashiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-3022
Areej Sultan AlthaqafiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Jumana Majdi AlsharifDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Hani Saleh FaidahDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Mashael BushyahPharmaceutical Care Services Department, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah 23816, Saudi Arabia.
Amal F AlotaibiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud Essam ElrggalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Jamal MahrousDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-741X
Safa S Almarzoky AbuhussainDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-5043
Najla A ObaidDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7094-0813
Manal AlgethamyDepartment of Infection Prevention & Control Program, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullmoin AlQarniInfectious Diseases Department, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Asim A KhogeerPlan and Research Department, General Directorate of Health Affairs of Makkah Region, Ministry of Health, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6508-7747
Zikria SaleemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-6347
Muhammad Shahid IqbalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0245-5976
Sami S AshgarDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-176X
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK.

Funding

Umm Al-Qura University 19-MED-1-01-0029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical significance of utilizing a vancomycin loading dose in critically ill patients remains unclear.

objectiveThe main aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the vancomycin loading dose in critically ill patients.

methodsWe performed a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, the Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, the Saudi Digital Library and other databases were searched. Studies that reported clinical outcomes among patients receiving the vancomycin LD were considered eligible. Data for this study were collected using PubMed, the Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Saudi Digital Library using the following terms: "vancomycin", "safety", "efficacy" and "loading dose" combined with the Boolean operator "AND" or "OR".

resultsA total of 17 articles, including 2 RCTs, 11 retrospective cohorts and 4 other studies, met the inclusion/exclusion criteria out of a total 1189 studies. Patients had different clinical characteristics representing a heterogenous group, including patients in critical condition, with renal impairment, sepsis, MRSA infection and hospitalized patients for hemodialysis or in the emergency department.

conclusionsThe study shows that the target therapeutic level is achieved more easily among patients receiving a weight-based LD as compared to patients received the usual dose without an increased risk of new-onset adverse drug reactions.

Indexed as

efficacyloading dosesafetyvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID35326872
PMCPMC8944428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.