Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326840›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison of Six Phenotypic Assays with Reference Methods for Assessing Colistin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales: Challenges and Opportunities.

Annamária Főldes, Edit Székely, Septimiu Toader Voidăzan, Minodora Dobreanu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. International journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Designed Multifunctional Peptides for Intracellular Targets.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of Carbapenemase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annamária FőldesDepartment of Microbiology, Laboratory of Medical Analysis, "Dr. Constantin Opriş" County Emergency Hospital, 430031 Baia Mare, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-6391
Edit SzékelyDepartment of Microbiology, Central Clinical Laboratory, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Septimiu Toader VoidăzanDepartment of Epidemiology, "George Emil Palade'' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Minodora DobreanuDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Central Clinical Laboratory, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROUniversitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș · RO

Funding

"George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mureş, Romania, 25/P3 AA/08.07.2020, ct.2401/21/31.10.2018 BB.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global escalation of severe infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) isolates has prompted increased usage of parenteral colistin. Considering the reported difficulties in assessing their susceptibility to colistin, the purpose of the study was to perform a comparative evaluation of six phenotypic assays-the colistin broth disc elution (CBDE), Vitek 2 Compact (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France), the Micronaut MIC-Strip Colistin (Merlin Diagnostika GMBH, Bornheim-Hensel, Germany), the gradient diffusion strip Etest (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France), ChromID Colistin R Agar (COLR) (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France), and the Rapid Polymyxin NP Test (ELITechGroup, Signes, France)-versus the reference method of broth microdilution (BMD). All false resistance results were further assessed using population analysis profiling (PAP). Ninety-two nonrepetitive clinical CPE strains collected from two hospitals were evaluated. The BMD confirmed 36 (39.13%) isolates susceptible to colistin. According to the BMD, the Micronaut MIC-Strip Colistin, the CBDE, and the COLR medium exhibited category agreement (CA) of 100%. In comparison with the BMD, the highest very major discrepancy (VMD) was noted for Etest (

Indexed as

broth microdilutioncarbapenemase-producing EnterobacteralesChromID colistin R agarcolistin broth disc elutioncolistin susceptibility testingEtestmicronaut MIC-strip colistinpopulation analysis profilingrapid polymyxin NP testVitek 2 compact

Identifiers

PMID35326840
PMCPMC8944616
OpenAlexW4220859613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.