Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326751›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

What Is the Most Effective Empirical Antibiotic Treatment for Early, Delayed, and Late Fracture-Related Infections?

Susanne Baertl, Nike Walter, Ulrike Engelstaedter, Martin Ehrenschwender, Florian Hitzenbichler, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fracture-Related Infection of the Proximal Femur - Diagnostics and Treatment.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Aetiology of long bone chronic osteomyelitis: an analysis of the current situation in one region in Egypt.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanne BaertlDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5326-7273
Nike WalterDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-2076
Ulrike EngelstaedterDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4365-2549
Martin EhrenschwenderInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology and Hygiene, Hospital of the Order of St. John, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Florian HitzenbichlerDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Volker AltDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0208-4650
Markus RuppDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-3783
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic treatment strategies for fracture-related infections (FRI) are often extrapolated from periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), although, in contrast to PJI, detailed analysis of pathogens and their antibiotic resistance is missing. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate antibiotic susceptibility profiles to identify effective empiric antibiotic treatment for early-, delayed-, and late-onset FRI. Patients treated for FRI from 2013 to 2020 were grouped into early (<2 weeks), delayed (3−10 weeks), and late (>10 weeks) onset of infection. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were examined with respect to broadly used antibiotics and antibiotic combinations. In total, 117 patients (early n = 19, delayed n = 60, late n = 38) were enrolled. In early-onset FRI, 100.0% efficacy would be achieved by meropenem + vancomycin, gentamicin + vancomycin, co-amoxiclav + glycopeptide, ciprofloxacin + glycopeptide and piperacillin/tazobactam + glycopeptide. For patients with delayed FRI, the highest susceptibility was revealed for meropenem + vancomycin, gentamicin + vancomycin and ciprofloxacin + glycopeptide (96.7%). Meropenem + vancomycin was the most effective empiric antimicrobial in patients with late-onset of infection with 92.1% coverage. No subgroup differences in antibiotic sensitivity profiles were observed except for the combination ciprofloxacin + glycopeptide, which was significantly superior in early FRI (F = 3.304, p = 0.04). Across all subgroups meropenem + vancomycin was the most effective empiric treatment in 95.7% of patients with confirmed susceptibility. Meropenem + vancomycin, gentamicin + vancomycin, co-amoxiclav + glycopeptide are the best therapeutic options for FRI, regardless of the onset of infection. To avoid multidrug resistance, established antibiotic combinations such as co-amoxiclav with a glycopeptide seem to be reasonable as a systemic antibiotic therapy, while vancomycin + gentamicin could be implemented in local antibiotic therapy to reduce adverse events during treatment.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceempiric antibiotic treatmentfracture-related infection

Identifiers

PMID35326751
PMCPMC8944514
OpenAlexW4214596719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.