Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326725›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Effect of Osimertinib on CTCs and ctDNA in EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: The Prognostic Relevance of Liquid Biopsy.

Galatea Kallergi, Emmanouil Kontopodis, Aliki Ntzifa, Núria Jordana-Ariza, Niki Karachaliou, Evangelia Pantazaka, Haris A Charalambous, Amanda Psyrri, Emily Tsaroucha, Ioannis Boukovinas and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cancers · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. ctDNACancer management and research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Galatea KallergiDepartment of Biology, Division of Genetics, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece.
Emmanouil KontopodisDepartment of Medical Oncology, "Venizelio-Pananio" General Hospital of Heraklion, 71500 Heraklion, Greece.
Aliki NtzifaAnalysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Lab, Department of Chemistry, University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece.
Núria Jordana-ArizaLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Niki KarachaliouLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Evangelia PantazakaDepartment of Biology, Division of Genetics, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6737-8428
Haris A CharalambousOncology Center of Bank of Cyprus, Department of Medical Oncology, Nicosia 2012, Cyprus.
Amanda PsyrriMedical Oncology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "ATTIKON" General Hospital of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Emily Tsaroucha7th Department of Pulmonary Diseases, "SOTIRIA" General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Ioannis BoukovinasDepartment of Medical Oncology, BIOCLINIKI Hospital, 11524 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anna KoumarianouHematology-Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4159-2511
Dora HatzidakiHellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), 1st Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan General Hospital, 15562 Athens, Greece.
Evi LianidouAnalysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Lab, Department of Chemistry, University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7796-5914
Vassilis GeorgouliasHellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), 1st Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan General Hospital, 15562 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-2522
Rafael RosellLaboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Athanasios KotsakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41500 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5530-6774
Hospital Universitario Dexeus · ESNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRHellenic Oncology Research Group · GRUniversity of Patras · GRBank of Cyprus Oncology Center · CYSotiria General Hospital · GRThe General Hospital of Heraklion "Venizeleio-Pananio" · GRUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

Astrazeneca 11345European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH-CREATE-INNOVATE T2ΕΔΚ-01562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLiquid biopsy is a useful tool for monitoring treatment outcome in solid tumors, including lung cancer. The relevance of monitoring CTCs and plasma ctDNA as predictors of clinical outcome was assessed in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib.

methodsForty-seven EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who had progressed on prior first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors were enrolled in the study and treated with osimertinib, irrespective of the presence of the T790M mutation in the primary tumor or the plasma. Peripheral blood was collected at baseline (

resultsOsimertinib resulted in an ORR of 34% (2 CR) and a DCR of 76.6%. The median PFS and OS values were 7.5 (range, 0.8-52.8) and 15.1 (range, 2.1-52.8) months, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 61.7%, 27.7%, and 61.5% of patients at baseline, post-Cycle 1, and EOT, respectively. CTCs (CK+/CD45-) were detected in 68.8%, 48.1%, and 61.9% of patients at the three time points, respectively. CTCs expressing both epithelial and mesenchymal markers (CK+/VIM+/CD45-) were detected in 56.3% and 29.6% of patients at baseline and post-Cycle 1, respectively. The detection of ctDNA at baseline and post-Cycle 1 was associated with shorter PFS and OS, whereas the ctDNA clearance post-Cycle 1 resulted in a significantly longer PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex and the detection of ctDNA at baseline were independent predictors of shorter PFS (HR: 2.6, 95% C.I.: 1.2-5.5,

conclusionsThe decrease in both CTCs and ctDNA occurring early during osimertinib treatment is predictive of better outcome, implying that liquid biopsy monitoring may be a valuable tool for the assessment of treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

CTCsctDNAEGFR mutantNSCLCosimertinib

Identifiers

PMID35326725
PMCPMC8946716
OpenAlexW4220950225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.