ArticleCancers2022
CDK6 Degradation Is Counteracted by p16
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-Based Design and Evaluation of Coumarin-Derived CDK4 Inhibitors for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Integrated Computational Study.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- CDK6 inactivation counteracts CALR-mutant-induced MPN evolution and sensitizes MPN stem cells to interferon-α treatment.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Advantages of PROTACs in achieving selective degradation of homologous protein families.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2026Review
- Histone deacetylases facilitate Th17-cell differentiation and pathogenicity in autoimmune uveitis via CDK6/ID2 axis.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Binding Mechanism of Inhibitors to CDK6 Deciphered by Multiple Independent Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free Energy Predictions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CIP/KIP and INK4 families as hostages of oncogenic signaling.Cell division · 2024Review
- Binding selectivity-dependent molecular mechanism of inhibitors towards CDK2 and CDK6 investigated by multiple short molecular dynamics and free energy landscapes.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Emerging approaches to CDK inhibitor development, a structural perspective.RSC chemical biology · 2023Article
- Isolation, Maintenance and Expansion of Adult Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells and Leukemic Stem Cells.Cancers · 2022Review
- Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in malignant hematopoiesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) represents a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of certain subtypes of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). CDK4/6 kinase inhibitors have been widely studied in many cancer types and their effects may be limited by primary and secondary resistance mechanisms. CDK4/6 degraders, which eliminate kinase-dependent and kinase-independent effects, have been suggested as an alternative therapeutic option. We show that the efficacy of the CDK6-specific protein degrader BSJ-03-123 varies among AML subtypes and depends on the low expression of the INK4 proteins p16
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.