Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326695›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Longitudinal Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms Compared to a Reference Cohort: Results of a Prospective Trial of the East German Study Group for Hematology and Oncology (OSHO).

Sabrina Jotschke, Susann Schulze, Nadja Jaekel, Beatrice Ludwig-Kraus, Robby Engelmann, Frank Bernhard Kraus, Christina Zahn, Nicole Nedlitz, Gabriele Prange-Krex, Johannes Mohm and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina JotschkeKrukenberg Cancer Center Halle, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Susann SchulzeKrukenberg Cancer Center Halle, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3856-7956
Nadja JaekelUniversity Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6162-515X
Beatrice Ludwig-KrausCentral Laboratory, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2660-4921
Robby EngelmannClinic III-Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1048-3638
Frank Bernhard KrausCentral Laboratory, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4354-9952
Christina ZahnUniversity Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Nicole NedlitzKrukenberg Cancer Center Halle, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Gabriele Prange-KrexGemeinschaftspraxis Mohm/Prange-Krex, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Johannes MohmGemeinschaftspraxis Mohm/Prange-Krex, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Bettina PeuserInternistisch-Onkologische Ärztegemeinschaft, 04179 Leipzig, Germany.
Maik SchwarzParacelsus Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, Schwerpunktpraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, 08261 Schoeneck, Germany.
Claudia SpohnHämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, 06110 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Timo BehlendorfGemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Gastroenterologie, 06110 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Mascha BinderUniversity Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Christian JunghanssClinic III-Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Sebastian BöttcherClinic III-Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-761X
Haifa Kathrin Al-AliKrukenberg Cancer Center Halle, University Hospital Halle (Saale), 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5009-2239
University Hospital in Halle · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEPraxis für Humangenetik · DECenter for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology · DE

Funding

German Leukemia and Lymphoma Foundation (Stiftung Deutsche Leukämie- & Lymphom-Hilfe) 32105069Medical Faculty of the Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg NoneMedical Faculty of the University Medical School Rostock none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess humoral responses longitudinally and cellular immunogenicity following SARS-CoV-2-vaccination in patients with hematologic and oncologic malignancies receiving checkpoint-inhibitors. Methods: This prospective multicenter trial of the East-German-Study-Group-for-Hematology-and-Oncology, enrolled 398 adults in a two (patients; n = 262) to one (controls; n = 136) ratio. Pre-vaccination, day 35 (d35), and day 120 (d120) blood samples were analyzed for anti-spike antibodies and d120 IL-2+IFNγ+TNFα+-CD4+- and CD8+-cells. Laboratories were blinded for patients and controls. Results: Patients belonged to the myeloid (n = 131), lymphoid (n = 104), and checkpoint-inhibitor (n = 17) cohorts. While d35 seroconversion was higher in controls (98%) compared to patients (68%) (p < 0.001), d120 seroconversion improved across all patient cohorts [checkpoint-inhibitors (81% to 100%), myeloid (82% to 97%), lymphoid (48% to 66%)]. CD4+- and CovCD8+-cells in the lymphoid (71%/31%) and control (74%/42%) cohorts were comparable but fewer in the myeloid cohort (53%, p = 0.003 /24%, p = 0.03). In patients with hematologic malignancies, no correlation between d120 humoral and cellular responses was found. A sizeable fraction of lymphoid patients demonstrated T-cell responses without detectable spike-specific-IgGs. Conclusions: Evidence of vaccine-elicited humoral and/or cellular immunogenicity in most patients is provided. Both humoral and cellular responses are crucial to determine which patients will generate/maintain immunity. The findings have implications on public health policy regarding recommendations for SARS-CoV-2 booster doses.

Indexed as

anti-spike-IgGCD4+-cellsCD8+-cellslymphoid neoplasmsmyeloid neoplasmsSARS-CoV-2 vaccinationseroconversionT-cells

Identifiers

PMID35326695
PMCPMC8946280
OpenAlexW4220836514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.