Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326552›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Updated Prognostic Factors in Localized NSCLC.

Simon Garinet, Pascal Wang, Audrey Mansuet-Lupo, Ludovic Fournel, Marie Wislez, Hélène Blons

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Breaking: The New 9Thoracic research and practice · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon GarinetPharmacogenomics and Molecular Oncology Unit, Biochemistry Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2182-8793
Pascal WangOncology Thoracic Unit, Pulmonology Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4057-3765
Audrey Mansuet-LupoPathology Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 Paris, France.
Ludovic FournelThoracic Surgery Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 Paris, France.
Marie WislezOncology Thoracic Unit, Pulmonology Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75014 Paris, France.
Hélène BlonsPharmacogenomics and Molecular Oncology Unit, Biochemistry Department, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 80% of lung cancer subtypes. Patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer may be considered for upfront surgical treatment. However, the overall 5-year survival rate is 59%. To improve survival, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was largely explored and showed an overall benefit of survival at 5 years < 7%. The evaluation of recurrence risk and subsequent need for ACT is only based on tumor stage (TNM classification); however, more than 25% of patients with stage IA/B tumors will relapse. Recently, adjuvant targeted therapy has been approved for EGFR-mutated resected NSCLC and trials are evaluating other targeted therapies and immunotherapies in adjuvant settings. Costs, treatment duration, emergence of resistant clones and side effects stress the need for a better selection of patients. The identification and validation of prognostic and theranostic markers to better stratify patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapies are needed. In this review, we report current validated clinical, pathological and molecular prognosis biomarkers that influence outcome in resected NSCLC, and we also describe molecular biomarkers under evaluation that could be available in daily practice to drive ACT in resected NSCLC.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapyprognosisresected NSCLC

Identifiers

PMID35326552
PMCPMC8945995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.