Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326470›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Clinical Trials Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Spinal Cord Injury: Challenges in Generating Evidence.

Lila Teixeira de Araújo, Carolina Thé Macêdo, Patrícia Kauanna Fonseca Damasceno, Ítalo Gabriel Costa das Neves, Carla Souza de Lima, Girlaine Café Santos, Thaís Alves de Santana, Gabriela Louise de Almeida Sampaio, Daniela Nascimento Silva, Cristiane Flora Villarreal and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Personalized Stem Cell-Based Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lila Teixeira de AraújoInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2713-0142
Carolina Thé MacêdoInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Patrícia Kauanna Fonseca DamascenoInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-3859
Ítalo Gabriel Costa das NevesInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Carla Souza de LimaInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Girlaine Café SantosInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Thaís Alves de SantanaInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Gabriela Louise de Almeida SampaioInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Daniela Nascimento SilvaInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Cristiane Flora VillarrealGonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Salvador 40296-710, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0113-7864
Alessandra Casemiro de Campos ChaguriInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Crislaine Gomes da SilvaInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Augusto César de Andrade MotaAMO Clinic/Etica Institute, Salvador 41950-640, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4398-2708
Roberto BadaróInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-5061
Ricardo Ribeiro Dos SantosInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Milena Botelho Pereira SoaresInstitute of Advanced Systems in Health, Senai Cimatec, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.
Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Industrial · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) 404167/2019-5Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation/CNPq/Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia 465656/2014-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains an important public health problem which often causes permanent loss of muscle strength, sensation, and function below the site of the injury, generating physical, psychological, and social impacts throughout the lives of the affected individuals, since there are no effective treatments available. The use of stem cells has been investigated as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of SCI. Although a significant number of studies have been conducted in pre-clinical and clinical settings, so far there is no established cell therapy for the treatment of SCI. One aspect that makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy is the heterogeneity of experimental designs in the clinical trials that have been published. Cell transplantation methods vary widely among the trials, and there are still no standardized protocols or recommendations for the therapeutic use of stem cells in SCI. Among the different cell types, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are the most frequently tested in clinical trials for SCI treatment. This study reviews the clinical applications of MSCs for SCI, focusing on the critical analysis of 17 clinical trials published thus far, with emphasis on their design and quality. Moreover, it highlights the need for more evidence-based studies designed as randomized controlled trials and potential challenges to be addressed in context of stem cell therapies for SCI.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansTreatment Outcomeclinical trialmesenchymal stem cellsmesenchymal stromal cellsspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID35326470
PMCPMC8946989
OpenAlexW4220765424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.