ReviewBrain sciences2022
Outcomes after Flow Diverter Treatment in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis and Development of a Clinical Prediction Model (OUTFLOW).
Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of MicroRNAs in Predicting the Neurological Outcome of Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-analysis.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023Pooled it
- Endovascular management of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to vertebrobasilar artery dissection using emergency flow-diverter stent placement combined with pseudoaneurysm coiling.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- How aneurysm shape affects occlusion success after flow diverter placement.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Flow Diverter Stents for the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of a Case Series.Cureus · 2025Article
- Observational
- Flow diverting stents in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single centre experience of 40 consecutive cases.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Management of ruptured aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with multiple basilar trunk aneurysms using a flow-diverter stent: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Editorial: Advances in flow-diversion devices for cerebral aneurysms.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Horizontal stenting via retrograde route for recurrent ruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm after clipping: A case report and literature review.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting early rupture and rebleeding risk after intracranial aneurysm embolization.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Flow diversion for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A single-center retrospective analysis of 30 consecutive cases.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundpatients with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) might need a flow diverter (FD) placement for complex acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We conducted a meta-analysis and developed a prediction model to estimate the favorable clinical outcome after the FD treatment in acutely ruptured IAs.
methodsa systematic literature search was performed from 2010 to January 2021 in PubMed and Embase databases. Studies with more than five patients treated with FDs within fifteen days were included. In total, 1157 studies were identified. The primary outcome measure was the favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcome measures were complete occlusion rates, aneurysm rebleeding, permanent neurologic deficit caused by procedure-related complications, and all-cause mortality. A prediction model was constructed using individual patient-level data.
results26 retrospective studies with 357 patients and 368 aneurysms were included. The pooled rates of the favorable clinical outcome, mortality, and complete aneurysm occlusion were 73.7% (95% CI 64.7-81.0), 17.1% (95% CI 13.3-21.8), and 85.6% (95% CI 80.4-89.6), respectively. Rebleeding occurred in 3% of aneurysms (11/368). The c-statistic of the final model was 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.89). All the studies provided a very low quality of evidence.
conclusionsFD treatment can be considered for complex ruptured IAs. Despite high complication rates, the pooled clinical outcomes seem favorable. The prediction model needs to be validated by larger prospective studies before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.