Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326350›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Outcomes after Flow Diverter Treatment in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis and Development of a Clinical Prediction Model (OUTFLOW).

Michelle F M Ten Brinck, Viktoria E Shimanskaya, René Aquarius, Ronald H M A Bartels, Frederick J A Meijer, Petra C Koopmans, Guido de Jong, Ajay K Wakhloo, Joost de Vries, Hieronymus D Boogaarts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michelle F M Ten BrinckDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-9322
Viktoria E ShimanskayaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-8496
René AquariusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0968-6884
Ronald H M A BartelsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frederick J A MeijerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5921-639X
Petra C KoopmansDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Guido de JongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ajay K WakhlooDepartment of Neurointerventional Radiology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Joost de VriesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hieronymus D BoogaartsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-2447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundpatients with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) might need a flow diverter (FD) placement for complex acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We conducted a meta-analysis and developed a prediction model to estimate the favorable clinical outcome after the FD treatment in acutely ruptured IAs.

methodsa systematic literature search was performed from 2010 to January 2021 in PubMed and Embase databases. Studies with more than five patients treated with FDs within fifteen days were included. In total, 1157 studies were identified. The primary outcome measure was the favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcome measures were complete occlusion rates, aneurysm rebleeding, permanent neurologic deficit caused by procedure-related complications, and all-cause mortality. A prediction model was constructed using individual patient-level data.

results26 retrospective studies with 357 patients and 368 aneurysms were included. The pooled rates of the favorable clinical outcome, mortality, and complete aneurysm occlusion were 73.7% (95% CI 64.7-81.0), 17.1% (95% CI 13.3-21.8), and 85.6% (95% CI 80.4-89.6), respectively. Rebleeding occurred in 3% of aneurysms (11/368). The c-statistic of the final model was 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.89). All the studies provided a very low quality of evidence.

conclusionsFD treatment can be considered for complex ruptured IAs. Despite high complication rates, the pooled clinical outcomes seem favorable. The prediction model needs to be validated by larger prospective studies before clinical application.

Indexed as

endovascular techniquesflow diverterintracranial aneurysmposterior communication artery

Identifiers

PMID35326350
PMCPMC8946659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.