Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326342›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Brain Correlates of the Alcohol Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy Response: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Studies.

Luiza Florence, Dângela Layne Silva Lassi, Guilherme T Kortas, Danielle R Lima, Cintia de Azevedo-Marques Périco, Arthur G Andrade, Julio Torales, Antonio Ventriglio, Domenico De Berardis, João P De Aquino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Physiological Role of ATPase for GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Luiza FlorenceDepartment of Neuroscience, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-870, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5515-9236
Dângela Layne Silva LassiDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-060, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7024-5623
Guilherme T KortasDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-060, SP, Brazil.
Danielle R LimaDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-060, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-3562
Cintia de Azevedo-Marques PéricoDepartment of Neuroscience, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-870, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2664-5101
Arthur G AndradeDepartment of Neuroscience, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-870, SP, Brazil.
Julio ToralesDepartment of Psychiatry, National University of Asunción, San Lorenzo 2064, Paraguay.ORCID 0000-0003-3277-7036
Antonio VentriglioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3934-7007
Domenico De BerardisMental Health Center of Giulianova, Asl Teramo, 64021 Giulianova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-5058
João P De AquinoDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
João M Castaldelli-MaiaDepartment of Neuroscience, FMABC University Center, Santo André 09060-870, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-2291
Universidade de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRSamara National Research University · RUUniversidad Nacional de Asunción · PYUniversity of Foggia · ITYale University · US

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/18034-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is highly prevalent worldwide, treating this condition remains challenging. Further, potential treatments for AUD do not fully address alcohol-induced neuroadaptive changes. Understanding the effects of pharmacotherapies for AUD on the human brain may lead to tailored, more effective treatments, and improved individual clinical outcomes.

objectivesWe systematically reviewed the literature for studies investigating pharmacotherapies for AUD that included neuroimaging-based treatment outcomes. We searched the PubMed, Scielo, and PsycINFO databases up to January 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND

interventionsEligible studies included those investigating pharmacotherapies for AUD and employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and/or proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-MRS). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsTwo independent reviewers screened studies' titles and abstracts for inclusion. Data extraction forms were shared among all the authors to standardize data collection. We gathered information on the following variables: sample size; mean age; sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; alcohol use status; study design and methodology; main neuroimaging findings and brain-regions of interest (i.e., brain areas activated by alcohol use and possible pharmacological interactions); and limitations of each study.

resultsOut of 177 studies selected, 20 studies provided relevant data for the research topic. Findings indicate that: (1) Acamprosate and gabapentin may selectively modulate limbic regions and the anterior cingulate cortex; (2) Naltrexone and disulfiram effects may involve prefrontal, premotor, and cerebellar regions; (3) Pharmacotherapies acting on glutamate and GABA neurotransmission involve primarily areas underpinning reward and negative affective states, and; (4) Pharmacotherapies acting on opioid and dopamine systems may affect areas responsible for the cognitive and motor factors of AUD. LIMITATIONS: Most of the studies were focused on naltrexone. A small number of studies investigated the action of disulfiram and gabapentin, and no neuroimaging studies investigated topiramate. In addition, the time between medication and neuroimaging scans varied widely across studies.

conclusionsWe identified key-brain regions modulated by treatments available for AUD. Some of the regions modulated by naltrexone are not specific to the brain reward system, such as the parahippocampal gyrus (temporal lobe), parietal and occipital lobes. Other treatments also modulate not specific regions of the reward system, but play a role in the addictive behaviors, including the insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The role of these brain regions in mediating the AUD pharmacotherapy response warrants investigation in future research studies.

Indexed as

acamprosatealcoholdisulfiramgabapentinnaltrexoneneuroimagingpharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35326342
PMCPMC8946664
OpenAlexW4221032192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.