Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326299›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Switching and Combining Device-Aided Therapies in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Double Centre Retrospective Study.

Dejan Georgiev, Sentilija Delalić, Nina Zupančič Križnar, Achinoam Socher, Tanya Gurevich, Maja Trošt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Advanced therapies in Parkinson's disease: an individualized approach to their indication.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dejan GeorgievDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1832-3441
Sentilija DelalićDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina Zupančič KrižnarDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Achinoam SocherMovement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Tanya GurevichMovement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2092-9848
Maja TroštDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SITel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevice-aided therapies (DAT), such as continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG), and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS), have markedly changed the treatment landscape of advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD). In some patients, it is necessary to switch or combine DATs for various reasons. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the frequency and reasons for switching between or combining DATs in two movement disorders centres in Slovenia and Israel.

methodsWe collected and analysed demographic and clinical data from aPD patients who switched between or combined DATs. Motor and non-motor reasons, adverse events for switching/combining, and their frequency were examined, as was the effect of DAT using the Global Improvement subscale of the Clinical Global Impression Scale, Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III, Mini Mental State Examination, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to analyse the data.

resultsOf 505 aPD patients treated with DATs at both centres between January 2009 and June 2021, we identified in a total of 30 patients (6%) who either switched DAT (

conclusionsSwitching between and combining DATs is uncommon, but in some patients brings substantial clinical improvement and should be considered in those who have either inadequate symptom control on DAT treatment or have developed DAT-related complications.

Indexed as

advanced Parkinson’s diseasecontinuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusiondeep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleusL-dopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion

Identifiers

PMID35326299
PMCPMC8946829
OpenAlexW4220815543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.