Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326271›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Brain Structure and Optimism Bias: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Approach.

Raviteja Kotikalapudi, Mihai Dricu, Dominik Andreas Moser, Tatjana Aue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raviteja KotikalapudiInstitute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Mihai DricuInstitute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik Andreas MoserInstitute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Tatjana AueInstitute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-1711

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation PP00P1_150492Swiss National Science Foundation PP00P1_183709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals often anticipate an unrealistically favorable future for themselves (personal optimism bias) or others (social optimism bias). While such biases are well established, little is known about their neuroanatomy. In this study, participants engaged in a soccer task and estimated the likelihood of successful passes in personal and social scenarios. Voxel-based morphometry revealed that personal optimism bias varied as a positive function of gray matter volume (GMV) in the putamen, frontal pole, hippocampus, temporal pole, inferior temporal gyrus, visual association areas, and mid-superior temporal gyrus. Social optimism bias correlated positively with GMV in the temporoparietal junction and negatively with GMV in the inferior temporal gyrus and pre-supplementary motor areas. Together, these findings suggest that parts of our optimistic outlook are biologically rooted. Moreover, while the two biases looked similar at the behavioral level, they were related to distinct gray matter structures, proposing that their underlying mechanisms are not identical.

Indexed as

behaviorfrontal polegray-matter volumeoptimism biaspositive psychologyputamentemporal polevoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID35326271
PMCPMC8946158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.