Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326268›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Effect of Lexical-Semantic Cues during Real-Time Sentence Processing in Aphasia.

Niloofar Akhavan, Christina Sen, Carolyn Baker, Noelle Abbott, Michelle Gravier, Tracy Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modulating Complex Sentence Processing in Aphasia Through Attention and Semantic Networks.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niloofar AkhavanSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Christina SenSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0281-8186
Carolyn BakerSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Noelle AbbottSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-5817
Michelle GravierDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Tracy LoveSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5112-2057

Funding

Neurocognitive Approaches to Communication DisordersT32DC007361 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tracy Love-Geffen · 2005 to 2026
$3.9M
The temporal characteristics of brain-language relationships: Evidence from impaiR01DC009272 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY, SHAPIRO, LEWIS P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Perfusion informed lesion mapping in aphasiaR21DC015263 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY · 2015 to 2016
$413k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009272NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015263NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC007361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a visual world eye-tracking paradigm, we investigated the real-time auditory sentence processing of neurologically unimpaired listeners and individuals with aphasia. We examined whether lexical-semantic cues provided as adjectives of a target noun modulate the encoding and retrieval dynamics of a noun phrase during the processing of complex, non-canonical sentences. We hypothesized that the real-time processing pattern of sentences containing a semantically biased lexical cue (e.g., the venomous snake) would be different than sentences containing unbiased adjectives (e.g., the voracious snake). More specifically, we predicted that the presence of a biased lexical cue would facilitate (1) lexical encoding (i.e., boosted lexical access) of the target noun, snake, and (2) on-time syntactic retrieval or dependency linking (i.e., increasing the probability of on-time lexical retrieval at post-verb gap site) for both groups. For unimpaired listeners, results revealed a difference in the time course of gaze trajectories to the target noun (snake) during lexical encoding and syntactic retrieval in the biased compared to the unbiased condition. In contrast, for the aphasia group, the presence of biased adjectives did not affect the time course of processing the target noun. Yet, at the post-verb gap site, the presence of a semantically biased adjective influenced syntactic re-activation. Our results extend the cue-based parsing model by offering new and valuable insights into the processes underlying sentence comprehension of individuals with aphasia.

Indexed as

aphasiaeye trackingreal-time sentence processingsemantic cuesyntax

Identifiers

PMID35326268
PMCPMC8946627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.