Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326028›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

LV Prasad Eye Institute EyeSmart electronic medical record-based analytics of big data: LEAD-Uveitis Report 1: Demographics and clinical features of uveitis in a multi-tier hospital based network in Southern India.

Mudit Tyagi, Anthony Vipin Das, Hrishikesh Kaza, Soumyava Basu, Rajeev R Pappuru, Avinash Pathengay, Somasheila Murthy, Hitesh Agrawal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Commentary: Rare eye diseases: More than meets the eye!Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mudit TyagiUveitis and Ocular Immunology Services; Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Center for Retina & Vitreous Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Anthony Vipin DasDepartment of eyeSmart EMR & AEye, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Hrishikesh KazaUveitis and Ocular Immunology Services, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Soumyava BasuUveitis and Ocular Immunology Services, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad; Retina and uveitis service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Rajeev R PappuruUveitis and Ocular Immunology Services; Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Center for Retina & Vitreous Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Avinash PathengayRetina and Uveitis Department, GMR Varalakshmi Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Somasheila MurthyUveitis and Ocular Immunology Services; The Cornea Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Hitesh AgrawalUveitis and Ocular Immunology Services; Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Center for Retina & Vitreous Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the demographics and epidemiology of uveitis presenting to a multi-tier ophthalmology hospital network in Southern India. Methods: Cross-sectional hospital-based study of 19,352 patients with uveitis presenting between March 2012 and August 2018. Results: In total, 1,734,272 new patients were seen across the secondary and tertiary centers of our multi-tier ophthalmology hospital network during the study period. Among them, 25,353 eyes of 19,352 patients were diagnosed with uveitis and were included in the study. Uveitis constituted 1.11% of all cases. The majority of patients were male (60.33%) and had unilateral (68.09%) affliction. The most common age group was 21-50 years with 12,204 (63.06%) patients. The most common type of uveitis was anterior uveitis, which was seen in 7380 (38.14%) patients, followed by posterior uveitis in 5397 (23.89%) patients. Among the infectious causes, tuberculosis was the most common etiology (2551 patients, 13%) followed by toxoplasmosis (1147 patients, 6%). Conclusion: Uveitis constituted 1.11% of all cases presenting to our clinics. It was more common in the age group of 21-50 and was predominantly unilateral. Anterior uveitis was the most common subtype seen in 38%.

Indexed as

UveitisUveitis, AnteriorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHospitalsHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBig dataelectronic medical recordsepidemiologytuberculosisuveitis

Identifiers

PMID35326028
PMCPMC9240530
OpenAlexW4221072302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.