Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326001›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Acceptability of artificial intelligence-based retina screening in general population.

Payal Shah, Divyansh Mishra, Mahesh Shanmugam, M J Vighnesh, Hariprasad Jayaraj

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study: (NYC-SIGHT)Tele-Retinal Image Findings and Importance of Photography.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparing code-free and bespoke deep learning approaches in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Artificial intelligence in retinal disease: clinical application, challenges, and future directions.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology - Machines think!Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Payal ShahDepartment of Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Divyansh MishraDepartment of Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mahesh ShanmugamDepartment of Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M J VighneshSankara College of Optometry, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Hariprasad JayarajLebencare Technologies Private Limited, Singapore.
Eye Hospital in Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A deep learning system (DLS) using artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a very promising technology in the future of healthcare diagnostics. While the concept of telehealth is emerging in every field of medicine, AI assistance in diagnosis can become a great tool for successful screening in telemedicine and teleophthalmology. The aim of our study was to assess the acceptability of AI-based retina screening. Methods: This was a prospective non-randomized study performed in the outpatient department of a tertiary eye care hospital. Patients older than 18 years who came for a regular eye check-up or a routine retina screening were recruited in the study. Fundus images of the posterior pole were captured on fundus on a phone camera (REMIDIO Results: We found that 90.4% were willing for an AI-based fundus screening; 96.2% were satisfied with AI-based screening. Patients with diabetes (P = 0.03) and the male population (P = 0.029) were more satisfied with the AI-based screening. The majority (i.e., 97.1%) felt that AI-based screening gave them a better understanding of their eye condition and 37.5% felt that AI-based retina screening prior to a doctor's visit can help in routine screening. Conclusion: Considering the current COVID-19 pandemic situation across the globe, this study highlights the importance of AI-based telescreening and positive patient approach toward this technology.

Indexed as

COVID-19OphthalmologyTelemedicineArtificial IntelligenceHumansMalePandemicsProspective StudiesRetinaAcceptanceartificial intelligencedeep learning in retinaretina screening

Identifiers

PMID35326001
PMCPMC9240537
OpenAlexW4220971523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.