Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35325705›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2022

Percolation across households in mechanistic models of non-pharmaceutical interventions in SARS-CoV-2 disease dynamics.

Caroline Franco, Leonardo Souto Ferreira, Vítor Sudbrack, Marcelo Eduardo Borges, Silas Poloni, Paulo Inácio Prado, Lisa J White, Ricardo Águas, Roberto André Kraenkel, Renato Mendes Coutinho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Caroline FrancoInstitute of Theoretical Physics, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil; Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Observatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil. Electronic address: caroline.franco@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Leonardo Souto FerreiraInstitute of Theoretical Physics, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil; Observatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil.
Vítor SudbrackInstitute of Theoretical Physics, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil; Observatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marcelo Eduardo BorgesObservatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil.
Silas PoloniInstitute of Theoretical Physics, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil; Observatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil.
Paulo Inácio PradoObservatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil; Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lisa J WhiteBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ricardo ÁguasNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Oxford, UK.
Roberto André KraenkelInstitute of Theoretical Physics, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil; Observatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil.
Renato Mendes CoutinhoObservatório COVID-19 BR, Brazil; Centro de Matemática, Computação e Cognição - Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Institute of Theoretical Physics · CNUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the emergence of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), mathematical modelling has become an important tool for planning strategies to combat the pandemic by supporting decision-making and public policies, as well as allowing an assessment of the effect of different intervention scenarios. A proliferation of compartmental models were developed by the mathematical modelling community in order to understand and make predictions about the spread of COVID-19. While compartmental models are suitable for simulating large populations, the underlying assumption of a well-mixed population might be problematic when considering non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) which have a major impact on the connectivity between individuals in a population. Here we propose a modification to an extended age-structured SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered) framework, with dynamic transmission modelled using contact matrices for various settings in Brazil. By assuming that the mitigation strategies for COVID-19 affect the connections among different households, network percolation theory predicts that the connectivity among all households decreases drastically above a certain threshold of removed connections. We incorporated this emergent effect at population level by modulating home contact matrices through a percolation correction function, with the few additional parameters fitted to hospitalisation and mortality data from the city of São Paulo. Our model with percolation effects was better supported by the data than the same model without such effects. By allowing a more reliable assessment of the impact of NPIs, our improved model provides a better description of the epidemiological dynamics and, consequently, better policy recommendations.

Indexed as

COVID-19BrazilCommunicable Disease ControlHumansModels, TheoreticalPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Compartmental modelCOVID-19PercolationSEIR

Identifiers

PMID35325705
PMCPMC8916837
OpenAlexW4221072374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.