Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35325439›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022

Unmet Therapeutic Needs of Non-Ambulatory Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Mixed-Method Analysis.

Anne L R Schuster, Norah L Crossnohere, Ryan Fischer, Patricia Furlong, John F P Bridges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Transition and management of patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a narrative review based on Italian experts' opinion and real-world experience.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne L R SchusterDepartment. of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH, USA. anne.schuster@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-1712
Norah L CrossnohereDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ryan FischerParent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.
Patricia FurlongParent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.
John F P BridgesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDuchenne muscular dystrophy has been a launching pad for patient-focused drug development (PFDD). Yet, PFDD efforts have largely neglected non-ambulatory patients. To support PFDD efforts in this population, we primarily sought to understand the needs of non-ambulatory Duchenne patients and, secondarily, to examine these needs in the context of the PUL-PROM-a validated patient-reported outcome measure of upper limb functioning.

methodsNon-ambulatory Duchenne patients or their caregivers from eight countries answered open-ended survey questions about patients' needs related to their most significant symptoms and important benefits of new treatments. The PUL-PROM was used to evaluate patients' upper limb functioning and was compared to data collected on non-ambulatory stage and quality of life. We thematically analyzed open-ended data, descriptively analyzed close-ended data, and compared themes by non-ambulatory stage.

resultsThe study included 275 participants. Mean patient age was 24. Most patients were early-stage non-ambulatory (67%). Thematic analysis identified three congruent themes between significant symptoms and important benefits of new treatments: muscle functioning, especially upper limb function; body system functioning; and quality of life. Muscle functioning and body system functioning were endorsed more frequently in responses from early- and late-stage patients, respectively. Mean PUL-PROM total score was 22 with higher scores in early-stage patients (p ≤ 0.001). Upper limb function positively correlated with quality of life (r = 0.42, p ≤ 0.001). DISCUSSION: Non-ambulatory Duchenne patients want new treatments that improve upper limb functioning and body system functioning, and not exclusively regaining ambulation. The PUL-PROM can be used as a patient-centric measure that accounts for the needs of later-stage Duchenne patients.

Indexed as

Muscular Dystrophy, DuchenneHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesUpper ExtremityPatient-focused drug developmentPatient reported outcome measuresRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID35325439
PMCPMC8943787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.