ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Genome Editing and Designer Crops for the Future.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Can We Exploit Inflammasomes for Host-Directed Therapy in the Fight againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Recent advances of the biological and biomedical applications of CRISPR/Cas systems.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Domestication spanning over thousands of years led to the evolution of crops that are being cultivated in recent times. Later, selective breeding methods were practiced by human to produce improved cultivars/germplasm. Classical breeding was further transformed into molecular- and genomics-assisted breeding strategies, however, these approaches are labor-intensive and time-consuming. The advent of omics technologies has facilitated the identification of genes and genetic determinants that regulate particular traits allowing the direct manipulation of target genes and genomic regions to achieve desirable phenotype. Recently, genome editing technologies such as meganucleases (MN), zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/CRISPR-Associated protein 9 (Cas9) have gained popularity for precise editing of genes to develop crop varieties with superior agronomic, physiological, climate-resilient, and nutritional traits. Owing to the efficiency and precision, genome editing approaches have been widely used to design the crops that can survive the challenges posed by changing climate, and also cater the food and nutritional requirements for ever-growing population. Here, we briefly review different genome editing technologies deployed for crop improvement, and the fundamental differences between GE technology and transgene-based approach. We also summarize the recent advances in genome editing and how this radical expansion can complement the previously established technologies along with breeding for creating designer crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35325415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.