Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35325377›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022

Multiple analyses suggests texture features can indicate the presence of tumor in the prostate tissue.

Sérgio Augusto Santana Souza, Leonardo Oliveira Reis, Allan Felipe Fattori Alves, Letícia Cotinguiba Silva, Maria Clara Korndorfer Medeiros, Danilo Leite Andrade, Athanase Billis, João Luiz Amaro, Daniel Lahan Martins, André Petean Trindade and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sérgio Augusto Santana SouzaSão Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, R. Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250 - Distrito de Rubião Junior, Botucatu, SP, CEP: 18618-689, Brazil.
Leonardo Oliveira ReisDepartment of Urology, UroScience, State University of Campinas, Unicamp and Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, PUC-Campinas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop-Jardim Ipaussurama, Campinas, SP, CEP: 13034-685, Brazil.
Allan Felipe Fattori AlvesBotucatu Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Medical Physics and Radioprotection Nucleus, Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n - UNESP - Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, CEP: 18618687, Brazil.
Letícia Cotinguiba SilvaSão Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, R. Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250 - Distrito de Rubião Junior, Botucatu, SP, CEP: 18618-689, Brazil.
Maria Clara Korndorfer MedeirosDepartment of Radiology, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Danilo Leite AndradeDepartment of Urology, UroScience, State University of Campinas, Unicamp and Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, PUC-Campinas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop-Jardim Ipaussurama, Campinas, SP, CEP: 13034-685, Brazil.
Athanase BillisDepartment of Anatomic Pathology and Urology, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil.
João Luiz AmaroDepartment of Urology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Daniel Lahan MartinsDepartment of Radiology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
André Petean TrindadeBotucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n - UNESP - Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, CEP:18618687, Brazil.
José Ricardo Arruda MirandaInstitute of Bioscience, São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, R. Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250 - Distrito de Rubião Junior, Botucatu, SP, CEP: 8618-689, Brazil.
Diana Rodrigues PinaBotucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Av. Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n - UNESP - Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, CEP:18618687, Brazil. diana.pina@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-1990
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRMedecell (Brazil) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303509/2019-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/05539-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated statistical and texture analysis abilities to differentiate cancerous from healthy tissue in magnetic resonance imaging. This study developed a method based on texture analysis and machine learning to differentiate prostate findings. Forty-eight male patients with PI-RADS classification and subsequent radical prostatectomy histopathological analysis were used as gold standard. Experienced radiologists delimited the regions of interest in magnetic resonance images. Six different groups of images were used to perform multiple analyses (seven analyses variations). Those analyses were outlined by specialists in urology as those of most significant importance for the classification. Forty texture features were extracted from each image and processed with Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naive Bayes. Those seven analyses variation results were described in terms of area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, F-score, precision and sensitivity. The highest AUC (93.7%) and accuracy (88.8%) were obtained when differentiating the group with both MRI and histopathology positive findings against the group with both negative MRI and histopathology. When differentiating the group with both MRI and histopathology positive findings versus the peripheral image zone group the AUC value was 86.6%. When differentiating the group with negative MRI/positive histopathology versus the group with both negative MRI and histopathology the AUC value was 80.7%. The evaluation of statistical and texture analysis promoted very suggestive indications for future work in prostate cancer suspicious regions. The method is fast for both region of interest selection and classification with machine learning and the result brings original contributions in the classification of different groups of patients. This tool is low-cost, and can be used to assist diagnostic decisions.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleHistopathologyMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID35325377
OpenAlexW4221134279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.