Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35325268›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2022

Effect of meteorological conditions on leisure walking: a time series analysis and the application of outdoor thermal comfort indexes.

Youjoung Kim, Robert Brown

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youjoung KimTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. kyj0244k@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-4884
Robert BrownTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leisure walking is affected by meteorological conditions. However, it is still not clear what scales of meteorological conditions and thermal status affect the number of people who choose to leisure walk. Using a time series regression, this study examines the heat-leisure walking relationship by analyzing the effect of the seasons, weather, microclimate, and outdoor thermal comfort on walking count. Eight thermal indexes were selected to estimate the pedestrians' thermal comfort, and their predictive capacities in walking count were evaluated. Particular consideration was given to identifying heat thresholds of walking that determined the tolerance range of pedestrian heat stress. Four years of hourly daytime walking counts and publicly available ASOS meteorological data at Seoul-lo 7017, a pedestrian bridge in Seoul, were used for the analysis. Our findings indicate that walking count is correlated with seasonal climatic variations, with the highest number of pedestrians observed in fall and the lowest in summer. Moreover, air temperature played a vital role, showing that a 5.0 °C rise in temperature was associated with a 1.34% rise in the square root of the walking count. Its impact becomes greater when combined with intense solar radiation and higher absolute humidity. The heat threshold for walking was between 23.8 °C and 26.2 °C. Empirical model indexes showed the highest predictive capacity in walking count at approximately 30.0%, which was followed by rational model indexes at 28.0%.

Indexed as

MicroclimateThermosensingCitiesHumansMeteorologyTemperatureTime FactorsWalkingHeat thresholdMeteorological conditionsOutdoor thermal comfort indexesTime series analysisWalking count

Identifiers

PMID35325268
OpenAlexW4220667694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.