Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35325261›Full record

SynthesisSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

The psychological impact of COVID-19 on Chinese healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nana Xiong, Kurt Fritzsche, Yiqi Pan, Johanna Löhlein, Rainer Leonhart

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nana XiongPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Kurt FritzscheDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Yiqi PanDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Johanna LöhleinDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rainer LeonhartDepartment for Social Psychology and Methodology, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. leonhart@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEPeking University · CNUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81800482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed at investigating five dimensions of the psychological impact (post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance or profession-related burnout) of COVID-19 on healthcare workers (HCW) in China.

methodsStudies that evaluated at least one of the five target dimensions of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on HCW in China were included. Studies with no data of our interest were excluded. Relevant Databases were searched from inception up to June 10, 2020. Preprint articles were also included. The methodological quality was assessed using the checklist recommended by AHRQ. Both the rate of prevalence and the severity of symptoms were pooled. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020197126) on July 09, 2020.

resultsWe included 44 studies with a total of 65,706 HCW participants. Pooled prevalence rates of moderate to severe PTSS, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances were 27% (95% CI 16%-38%), 17% (13-21%), 15% (13-16%), and 15% (7-23%), respectively; while the prevalence of mild to severe level of PTSS, anxiety, and depression was estimated as 31% (25-37%), 37% (32-42%) and 39% (25-52%). Due to the lack of data, no analysis of profession-related burnout was pooled. Subgroup analyses indicated higher prevalence of moderate to severe psychological impact in frontline HCW, female HCW, nurses, and HCW in Wuhan.

conclusionAbout a third of HCW in China showed at least one dimension of psychological symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the prevalence of moderate and severe syndromes was relatively low. Studies on profession-related burnout, long-term impact, and the post-stress growth are still needed.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19AnxietyDepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsChinese healthcare workersCOVID-19Mental healthPsychological impactStress

Identifiers

PMID35325261
PMCPMC8943357
OpenAlexW4220741648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.