Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35324964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Testing both affordability-availability and psychological-coping mechanisms underlying changes in alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Orla McBride, Eimhear Bunting, Oisín Harkin, Sarah Butter, Mark Shevlin, Jamie Murphy, Liam Mason, Todd K Hartman, Ryan McKay, Philip Hyland and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Orla McBrideUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3399-9466
Eimhear BuntingUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Oisín HarkinUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Sarah ButterUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Mark ShevlinUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Jamie MurphyUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Liam MasonUniversity College London, London, England.
Todd K HartmanUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Ryan McKayRoyal Holloway, University of London, Egham, England.
Philip HylandMaynooth University, Maynooth, Republic of Ireland.
Liat LevitaUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Kate M BennettUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.
Thomas V A StocksUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Jilly Gibson-MillerUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Anton P MartinezUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Frédérique VallièresTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Richard P BentallUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two theoretical perspectives have been proffered to explain changes in alcohol use during the pandemic: the 'affordability-availability' mechanism (i.e., drinking decreases due to changes in physical availability and/or reduced disposable income) and the 'psychological-coping' mechanism (i.e., drinking increases as adults attempt to cope with pandemic-related distress). We tested these alternative perspectives via longitudinal analyses of the COVID-19 Psychological Consortium (C19PRC) Study data (spanning three timepoints during March to July 2020). Respondents provided data on psychological measures (e.g., anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, paranoia, extraversion, neuroticism, death anxiety, COVID-19 anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, resilience), changes in socio-economic circumstances (e.g., income loss, reduced working hours), drinking motives, solitary drinking, and 'at-risk' drinking (assessed using a modified version of the AUDIT-C). Structural equation modelling was used to determine (i) whether 'at-risk' drinking during the pandemic differed from that recalled before the pandemic, (ii) dimensions of drinking motives and the psychosocial correlates of these dimensions, (iii) if increased alcohol consumption was predicted by drinking motives, solitary drinking, and socio-economic changes. The proportion of adults who recalled engaging in 'at-risk' drinking decreased significantly from 35.9% pre-pandemic to 32.0% during the pandemic. Drinking to cope was uniquely predicted by experiences of anxiety and/or depression and low resilience levels. Income loss or reduced working hours were not associated with coping, social enhancement, or conformity drinking motives, nor changes in drinking during lockdown. In the earliest stage of the pandemic, psychological-coping mechanisms may have been a stronger driver to changes in adults' alcohol use than 'affordability-availability' alone.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingCommunicable Disease ControlCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansMotivationPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35324964
PMCPMC8947385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.