ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Ten simple rules for making a software tool workflow-ready.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A case study in statistical software development for advanced evidence synthesis: the combined value of analysts and research software engineers.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Advancing bioinformatics capacity through Nextflow and nf-core: lessons from an early-to mid-career researchers-focused program at The Kids Research Institute Australia.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Ten simple rules for training scientists to make better software.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- dtool and dserver: A flexible ecosystem for findable data.PloS one · 2024Article
- "Be sustainable": EOSC-Life recommendations for implementation of FAIR principles in life science data handling.The EMBO journal · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for building FAIR workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Developing and reusing bioinformatics data analysis pipelines using scientific workflow systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Ten simple rules and a template for creating workflows-as-applications.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- ExplorePipolin: reconstruction and annotation of piPolB-encoding bacterial mobile elements from draft genomes.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.