Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35324605›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Considerations on Baseline Generation for Imaging AI Studies Illustrated on the CT-Based Prediction of Empyema and Outcome Assessment.

Raphael Sexauer, Bram Stieltjes, Jens Bremerich, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli, Noemi Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raphael SexauerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-7912
Bram StieltjesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Jens BremerichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Tugba Akinci D'AntonoliDepartment of Informatics, Division of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7237-711X
Noemi SchmidtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For AI-based classification tasks in computed tomography (CT), a reference standard for evaluating the clinical diagnostic accuracy of individual classes is essential. To enable the implementation of an AI tool in clinical practice, the raw data should be drawn from clinical routine data using state-of-the-art scanners, evaluated in a blinded manner and verified with a reference test. Three hundred and thirty-five consecutive CTs, performed between 1 January 2016 and 1 January 2021 with reported pleural effusion and pathology reports from thoracocentesis or biopsy within 7 days of the CT were retrospectively included. Two radiologists (4 and 10 PGY) blindly assessed the chest CTs for pleural CT features. If needed, consensus was achieved using an experienced radiologist's opinion (29 PGY). In addition, diagnoses were extracted from written radiological reports. We analyzed these findings for a possible correlation with the following patient outcomes: mortality and median hospital stay. For AI prediction, we used an approach consisting of nnU-Net segmentation, PyRadiomics features and a random forest model. Specificity and sensitivity for CT-based detection of empyema (

Indexed as

AIcomputed tomographyempyemaoutcomepleural findings

Identifiers

PMID35324605
PMCPMC8954780
OpenAlexW4213416485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.