How Should Clinicians Determine a Traumatized Patient's Readiness to Return to Work?

Tabitha E H Moses, Arash Javanbakht

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in AMA journal of ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tabitha E H MosesMD/PhD candidate in the Translational Neuroscience Program at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, Michigan.

Arash JavanbakhtPsychiatrist and director of the Stress, Trauma, and Anxiety Research Clinic at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

Neuromodulation of stress-induced dysfunction and drug-seeking in opioid use disorder: comparison of fronto-cortical targetsF30DA052118 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOSES, TABITHA EMILY HOWARD · 2021 to 2024

$196k

NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA052118

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A clinician's standard primary role is to treat and monitor their patients' health and to be their ally. Clinicians with obligations to patients and to organizations, however, must also assess patients for nontherapeutic purposes (eg, readiness to resume work). These 2 obligations can conflict, and, when they do, clinicians must balance their duties to patients and to society. We propose criteria clinicians should consider when determining a patient's readiness to return to work and offer recommendations for interpreting factors that influence this decision.

Indexed as

Return to WorkHumans

Identifiers

PMID35324097

DOI10.1001/amajethics.2022.111

PMCPMC8958981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.