Trial reportJAMA oncology2022
Effect of Induction Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine vs Cisplatin and Fluorouracil on Failure-Free Survival for Patients With Stage IVA to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02940925 (TPC vs PF as Induction Chemotherapy Combined With CCRT for Stage IVa-b Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, a Prospective,Parallel, Randomized, Open Labeled, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TPC vs PF as Induction Chemotherapy Combined With CCRT for Stage IVa-b Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, a Prospective,Parallel, Randomized, Open Labeled, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative study of three treatment approaches on overall survival and treatment response in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: network meta-analysis of RCTs (4221 patients).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Camrelizumab and apatinib plus induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 2 clinical trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Incorporating early cfEBV DNA clearance into clinical risk stratification to tailor induction chemotherapy cycles for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- De-Escalation Strategies in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- PRMT5 upregulates KCNMB4 expression via histone methylation to promote paclitaxel resistance in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Capecitabine-based triplet (TPX) as induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: a daycare-based cohort study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy relative dose intensity and survival outcomes in pediatric and adolescent locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- APOL2 Stabilizes Ku80 to Confer NHEJ-Mediated Radioresistance in Gastric Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Two or three cycles of induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Anti-PD-1 antibody with or without capecitabine as maintenance therapy after first-line therapy of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Reply to Commentary on "Metronomic S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma".Cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Uncovering the molecular mechanisms of Qingdu Zengye Decoction in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an integrative investigation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Synergistic anticancer and antibacterial effects of novel regimens of phytopolyphenols and repurposing drugs on cultured cells.Oncology research · 2025Article
- Combining interleukin 6 and EBV DNA levels predicts survival outcomes for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving chemoimmunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- NAB-paclitaxel and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Induction chemotherapy added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the optimal induction regimen remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (TPC) improves survival vs cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) prior to chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial recruited 238 patients at 4 hospitals in China from October 20, 2016, to August 29, 2019. Patients were 18 to 65 years of age with treatment-naive, nonkeratinizing stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive induction chemotherapy with two 21-day cycles of TPC (intravenous paclitaxel [150 mg/m2, day 1], intravenous cisplatin [60 mg/m2, day 1], and oral capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1-14]) or PF (intravenous cisplatin [100 mg/m2, day 1] and fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5]), followed by chemoradiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety. Results: Overall, 238 eligible patients (187 men [78.6%]; median age, 45 years [range, 18-65 years]) were randomly assigned to receive TPC (n = 118) or PF (n = 120). The median follow-up duration was 48.4 months (IQR, 39.6-53.3 months). Failure-free survival at 3 years was 83.5% (95% CI, 77.0%-90.6%) in the TPC group and 68.9% (95% CI, 61.1%-77.8%) in the PF group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = .004). Induction with the TPC regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of distant metastases (stratified HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-0.98]; P = .04) and locoregional recurrence (stratified HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.93]; P = .03) compared with the PF regimen. However, there was no effect on early overall survival (stratified HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.18]; P = .10). The incidences of grade 3 to 4 acute adverse events and late-onset toxicities were 57.6% (n = 68) and 13.6% (16 of 118), respectively, in the TPC group and 65.8% (n = 79) and 17.9% (21 of 117), respectively, in the PF group. One treatment-related death occurred in the PF group. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of TPC for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved failure-free survival compared with 2 cycles of PF, with no increase in the toxicity profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02940925.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.