Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323837›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2022

The (mis)government in the COVID-19 pandemic and the psychosocial implications: discipline, subjection, and subjectivity.

Janaína Quinzen Willrich, Luciane Prado Kantorski, Ariane da Cruz Guedes, Carmen Terezinha Leal Argiles, Marta Solange Streicher Janelli da Silva, Dariane Lima Portela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janaína Quinzen WillrichUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-9305
Luciane Prado KantorskiUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9726-3162
Ariane da Cruz GuedesUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Departamento de Enfermagem em Saúde Coletiva, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-787X
Carmen Terezinha Leal ArgilesUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-9553
Marta Solange Streicher Janelli da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Curso de Psicologia, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1479-0544
Dariane Lima PortelaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-1823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto analyze the psychosocial implications arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, reported in online service, from the perspective of Michel Foucault's concepts of biopower, biopolitics and governmentality.

methodqualitative documental research, with analysis of medical records of users assisted in a therapeutic listening chat, between April and October 2020.

resultsthe data were organized into two themes: Governmentality in the COVID-19 pandemic and the production of psychosocial implications of anxiety and fear and Discipline and subjection in the COVID-19 pandemic: subjectivities marked by sadness and anguish. The first demonstrates that the "art of governing" in Brazil produced instabilities and uncertainties that influenced the production of fear of contamination/death/and non-access to treatment and anxiety. In the second theme, we can see how disciplinary control and biopolitical regulation are combined. In Brazil, an extremely unequal country, subjectivity and subjectivities marked by anguish, feelings of discouragement and sadness have been produced.

conclusionthe exclusionary processes were deepened in the pandemic, with the exercise of a biopolitics that makes life precarious and produces psychological distress.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyEmotionsGovernmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID35323837
PMCPMC10081631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.