Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Effect of chronic and acute enterotoxigenic E. coli challenge on growth performance, intestinal inflammation, microbiome, and metabolome of weaned piglets.

Justin X Boeckman, Sarah Sprayberry, Abby M Korn, Jan S Suchodolski, Chad Paulk, Kenneth Genovese, Raquel R Rech, Paula R Giaretta, Anna K Blick, Todd Callaway and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. EnterotoxigenicTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Heat-KilledAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Summary of methodology used in enterotoxigenicTranslational animal science · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Justin X Boeckman *Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Sarah Sprayberry *Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Abby M KornDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Jan S SuchodolskiDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gastrointestinal Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Chad PaulkDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Kenneth GenoveseUSDA-ARS, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX, USA.
Raquel R RechDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Paula R GiarettaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Anna K BlickDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Todd CallawayUSDA-ARS, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, TX, USA.
Jason J GillDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. jason.gill@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Center · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Veterinary Student Research TrainingT35OD010991 · OD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI GADDY, DANA · 2012 to 2025
$920k
NIH HHS T35 OD010991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-weaning enteropathies in swine caused by pathogenic E. coli, such as post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) or edema disease (ED), remain a significant problem for the swine industry. Reduction in the use of antibiotics over concerns of antibiotic resistance and public health concerns, necessitate the evaluation of effective antibiotic alternatives to prevent significant loss of livestock and/or reductions in swine growth performance. For this purpose, an appropriate piglet model of pathogenic E. coli enteropathy is required. In this study, we attempted to induce clinical signs of post-weaning disease in a piglet model using a one-time acute or lower daily chronic dose of a pathogenic E. coli strain containing genes for both heat stable and labile toxins, as well as Shiga toxin. The induced disease state was monitored by determining fecal shedding and colonization of the challenge strain, animal growth performance, cytokine levels, fecal calprotectin, histology, fecal metabolomics, and fecal microbiome shifts. The most informative analyses were colonization and shedding of the pathogen, serum cytokines, metabolomics, and targeted metagenomics to determine dysbiosis. Histopathological changes of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and tight junction leakage as measured by fecal calprotectin concentrations were not observed. Chronic dosing was similar to the acute regimen suggesting that a high dose of pathogen, as used in many studies, may not be necessary. The piglet disease model presented here can be used to evaluate alternative PWD treatment options.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsMicrobiotaSwine DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiarrheaInflammationLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMetabolomeSwineWeaningAnti-Bacterial AgentsLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complex

Identifiers

PMID35323827
PMCPMC8943154
OpenAlexW4220874460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.