Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323743›Full record

ArticleMembranes2022

Antibacterial Activity of Isobavachalcone (IBC) Is Associated with Membrane Disruption.

Leticia Ribeiro de Assis, Reinaldo Dos Santos Theodoro, Maria Beatriz Silva Costa, Julyanna Andrade Silva Nascentes, Miguel Divino da Rocha, Meliza Arantes de Souza Bessa, Ralciane de Paula Menezes, Guilherme Dilarri, Giovane Böerner Hypolito, Vanessa Rodrigues Dos Santos and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Isobavachalcone exhibits antifungal and antibiofilm effects againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Isobavachalcone FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leticia Ribeiro de AssisDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto 15054-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-8934
Reinaldo Dos Santos TheodoroDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto 15054-000, SP, Brazil.
Maria Beatriz Silva CostaDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto 15054-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4840-8032
Julyanna Andrade Silva NascentesDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto 15054-000, SP, Brazil.
Miguel Divino da RochaDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto 15054-000, SP, Brazil.
Meliza Arantes de Souza BessaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Umuarama 38405-320, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3120-1799
Ralciane de Paula MenezesDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Umuarama 38405-320, MG, Brazil.
Guilherme DilarriDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rio Claro 130506-900, SP, Brazil.
Giovane Böerner HypolitoDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rio Claro 130506-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-2269
Vanessa Rodrigues Dos SantosDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Cristiane DuqueDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, Brazil.
Henrique FerreiraDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rio Claro 130506-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-9420
Carlos Henrique Gomes MartinsDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Umuarama 38405-320, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-6878
Luis Octavio RegasiniDepartment of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, Humanities and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José do Rio Preto 15054-000, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 471129/2013-5, 306251/2016-7, 429322/2018-6São Paulo Research Foundation 2014/2018/15083-2-0,
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isobavachalcone (IBC) is a natural prenylated chalcone with a broad spectrum of pharmacological properties. In this work, we newly synthesized and investigated the antibacterial activity of IBC against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and mycobacterial species. IBC was active against Gram-positive bacteria, mainly against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 1.56 and 3.12 µg/mL, respectively. On the other hand, IBC was not able to act against Gram-negative species (MIC > 400 µg/mL). IBC displayed activity against mycobacterial species (MIC = 64 µg/mL), including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium kansasii. IBC was able to inhibit more than 50% of MSSA and MRSA biofilm formation at 0.78 µg/mL. Its antibiofilm activity was similar to vancomycin, which was active at 0.74 µg/mL. In order to study the mechanism of the action by fluorescence microscopy, the propidium iodide (PI) and SYTO9 fluorophores indicated that IBC disrupted the membrane of Bacillus subtilis. Toxicity assays using human keratinocytes (HaCaT cell line) showed that IBC did not have the capacity to reduce the cell viability. These results suggested that IBC is a promising antibacterial agent with an elucidated mode of action and potential applications as an antibacterial drug and a medical device coating.

Indexed as

antibacterialbiofilmchalconemembranenatural product

Identifiers

PMID35323743
PMCPMC8950343
OpenAlexW4214757897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.