ArticleMetabolites2022
A Multi-Label Classifier for Predicting the Most Appropriate Instrumental Method for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern.
Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Recent Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pesticide Analysis in Food Samples.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prioritization of Unknown LC-HRMS Features Based on Predicted Toxicity Categories.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Review
- Estimating LoD-s Based on the Ionization Efficiency Values for the Reporting and Harmonization of Amenable Chemical Space in Nontargeted Screening LC/ESI/HRMS.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Online and Offline Prioritization of Chemicals of Interest in Suspect Screening and Non-targeted Screening with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Review
- The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry.Environmental sciences Europe · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) have revolutionized analytical chemistry among many other disciplines. These advanced instrumentations allow to theoretically capture the whole chemical universe that is contained in samples, giving unimaginable opportunities to the scientific community. Laboratories equipped with these instruments produce a lot of data daily that can be digitally archived. Digital storage of data opens up the opportunity for retrospective suspect screening investigations for the occurrence of chemicals in the stored chromatograms. The first step of this approach involves the prediction of which data is more appropriate to be searched. In this study, we built an optimized multi-label classifier for predicting the most appropriate instrumental method (LC-HRMS or GC-HRMS or both) for the analysis of chemicals in digital specimens. The approach involved the generation of a baseline model based on the knowledge that an expert would use and the generation of an optimized machine learning model. A multi-step feature selection approach, a model selection strategy, and optimization of the classifier's hyperparameters led to a model with accuracy that outperformed the baseline implementation. The models were used to predict the most appropriate instrumental technique for new substances. The scripts are available at GitHub and the dataset at Zenodo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.