ReviewInsects2022
Integrative Alternative Tactics for Ixodid Control.
Review in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acaricidal Activity of Liquid Culture Filtrates from Nematophagous Fungi AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Apiol-Rich and Caryophyllene-Oxygenated Essential Oils from AmazonianMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acaricidal effects of diatomaceous earth on Haemaphysalis longicornis under laboratory conditions.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of acaricidal effect of terpinolene and γ-terpinene onJournal of veterinary science · 2025Article
- A review of acaricides and their resistance mechanisms in hard ticks and control alternatives with synergistic agents.Acta tropica · 2025Review
- Piroplasm infestations in cattle: exploring tick control usingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Biological Characteristics of the Cytochrome P 450 Family and the Mechanism of Terpinolene Metabolism inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evolution of tick vaccinology.Parasitology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- The Role of Parasitoid Wasps,Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ixodids (hard ticks), ectoparasitic arthropods that vector the causal agents of many serious diseases of humans, domestic animals, and wildlife, have become increasingly difficult to control because of the development of resistance against commonly applied synthetic chemical-based acaricides. Resistance has prompted searches for alternative, nonconventional control tactics that can be used as part of integrated ixodid management strategies and for mitigating resistance to conventional acaricides. The quest for alternative control tactics has involved research on various techniques, each influenced by many factors, that have achieved different degrees of success. Alternative approaches include cultural practices, ingested and injected medications, biological control, animal- and plant-based substances, growth regulators, and inert desiccant dusts. Research on biological control of ixodids has mainly focused on predators, parasitoid wasps, infective nematodes, and pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Studies on animal-based substances have been relatively limited, but research on botanicals has been extensive, including whole plant, extract, and essential oil effects on ixodid mortality, behavior, and reproduction. The inert dusts kaolin, silica gel, perlite, and diatomaceous earth are lethal to ixodids, and they are impervious to environmental degradation, unlike chemical-based toxins, remaining effective until physically removed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.