Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323514›Full record

ArticleMarine drugs2022

In Silico Evaluation of Antifungal Compounds from Marine Sponges against COVID-19-Associated Mucormycosis.

Omkar Pokharkar, Hariharan Lakshmanan, Grigory Zyryanov, Mikhail Tsurkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Enhancing Antifungal Drug Discovery Through Co-Culture with AntarcticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Potency of Xanthone Derivatives fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Bioactive natural products in COVID-19 therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omkar PokharkarDepartment of Organic & Bio-Molecular Chemistry, Chemical Engineering Institute, Ural Federal University, Mira St. 19, 620002 Yekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-3678
Hariharan LakshmananLa Trobe Institute of Molecular Science, Plenty Rd & Kingsbury Dr., Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.
Grigory ZyryanovDepartment of Organic & Bio-Molecular Chemistry, Chemical Engineering Institute, Ural Federal University, Mira St. 19, 620002 Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Mikhail TsurkanLeibniz Institute of Polymer Research, 01005 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-3890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world is already facing the devastating effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A disseminated mucormycosis epidemic emerged to worsen this situation, causing havoc, especially in India. This research aimed to perform a multitargeted docking study of marine-sponge-origin bioactive compounds against mucormycosis. Information on proven drug targets and marine sponge compounds was obtained via a literature search. A total of seven different targets were selected. Thirty-five compounds were chosen using the PASS online program. For homology modeling and molecular docking, FASTA sequences and 3D structures for protein targets were retrieved from NCBI and PDB databases. Autodock Vina in PyRx 0.8 was used for docking studies. Further, molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the IMODS server for top-ranked docked complexes. Moreover, the drug-like properties and toxicity analyses were performed using Lipinski parameters in Swiss-ADME, OSIRIS, ProTox-II, pkCSM, and StopTox servers. The results indicated that naamine D, latrunculin A and S, (+)-curcudiol, (+)-curcuphenol, aurantoside I, and hyrtimomine A had the highest binding affinity values of -8.8, -8.6, -9.8, -11.4, -8.0, -11.4, and -9.0 kcal/mol, respectively. In sum, all MNPs included in this study are good candidates against mucormycosis. (+)-curcudiol and (+)-curcuphenol are promising compounds due to their broad-spectrum target inhibition potential.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiological ProductsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AnimalsCoinfectionCOVID-19Fungal ProteinsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMucormycosisPoriferaToxicity Tests, AcuteAntifungal AgentsBiological ProductsFungal Proteinsantifungalantiviralbioactive compoundsCAMCOVID-19disseminated mucormycosismarine drugsmarine spongesmolecular dockingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35323514
PMCPMC8950821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.