Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323437›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Sensor-Based Gait Analysis to Identify Patients with Osteopenia and Sarcopenia in Daily Life.

Jeong-Kyun Kim, Myung-Nam Bae, Kangbok Lee, Jae-Chul Kim, Sang Gi Hong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. AN INTELLIGIBLE AI-DRIVEN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR POSTSTROKE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeong-Kyun KimDepartment of Computer Software, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-1752
Myung-Nam BaeIntelligent Convergence Research Laboratory, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 34129, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0519-3545
Kangbok LeeIntelligent Convergence Research Laboratory, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 34129, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9508-5577
Jae-Chul KimIntelligent Convergence Research Laboratory, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon 34129, Korea.
Sang Gi HongDepartment of Computer Software, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8135-3286
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute · KR

Funding

Development of Customized Contents Provision Technology for Realistic Disaster Management Based on Spatial Information Program funded by Ministry of the Interior and Safety of Korean government 21DRMS-B146826-04National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) 2021M3I2A1077405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteopenia and sarcopenia can cause various senile diseases and are key factors related to the quality of life in old age. There is need for portable tools and methods that can analyze osteopenia and sarcopenia risks during daily life, rather than requiring a specialized hospital setting. Gait is a suitable indicator of musculoskeletal diseases; therefore, we analyzed the gait signal obtained from an inertial-sensor-based wearable gait device as a tool to manage bone loss and muscle loss in daily life. To analyze the inertial-sensor-based gait, the inertial signal was classified into seven gait phases, and descriptive statistical parameters were obtained for each gait phase. Subsequently, explainable artificial intelligence was utilized to analyze the contribution and importance of descriptive statistical parameters on osteopenia and sarcopenia. It was found that XGBoost yielded a high accuracy of 88.69% for osteopenia, whereas the random forest approach showed a high accuracy of 93.75% for sarcopenia. Transfer learning with a ResNet backbone exhibited appropriate performance but showed lower accuracy than the descriptive statistical parameter-based identification result. The proposed gait analysis method confirmed high classification accuracy and the statistical significance of gait factors that can be used for osteopenia and sarcopenia management.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, MetabolicSarcopeniaWearable Electronic DevicesArtificial IntelligenceGaitGait AnalysisHumansQuality of Lifegait analysisIMUosteopeniasarcopeniaSHAPXAI

Identifiers

PMID35323437
PMCPMC8946270
OpenAlexW4221061915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.