Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323396›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Managing the Consequences of Oncological Major Surgery: A Short- and Medium-Term Skills Assessment Proposal for Patient and Caregiver through M.A.D.I.T. Methodology.

Gian Piero Turchi, Alessandro Fabbian, Rita Alfieri, Anna Da Roit, Salvatore Marano, Genny Mattara, Pierluigi Pilati, Carlo Castoro, Davide Bassi, Marta Silvia Dalla Riva and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gian Piero TurchiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-5339
Alessandro FabbianDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6053-4774
Rita AlfieriUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4993-2197
Anna Da RoitDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Salvatore MaranoDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-950X
Genny MattaraUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Pierluigi PilatiUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Carlo CastoroDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Davide BassiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2025-6559
Marta Silvia Dalla RivaDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-364X
Luisa OrrùDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-6227
Eleonora PintoUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5404-5958

Funding

Fondazione Morgagni no numberUniversity of Padua Uni-Impresa 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of cancer surgery and treatment harm patients' life and working ability: major causes of this can be intensified by the postoperative symptoms. This study, the first part of the HEAGIS project (Health and Employment after Gastrointestinal Surgery), proposes a method to assess patients and caregivers' competences in dealing with postoperative course and the related needs to improve the adequate competences. In this observational study, an ad hoc structured interview was conducted with 47 patients and 15 caregivers between the third and fifteenth postoperative day. Oesophageal (38%), esophagogastric junction (13%), gastric (30%), colon (8%) and rectum (11%) cancer patients were considered. Computerized textual data analysis methodology was used to identify levels of competences. Text analysis highlighted three different levels (low, medium and high) of four specific types of patients and caregivers' competences. In particular, the overall trend of the preview of future scenarios and use of resource competences was low. Less critical were situation evaluation and preview repercussion of own actions' competences. Caregivers' trends were similar. The Kruskal-Wallis test did not distinguish any differences in the level of competences related to the characteristics of the participants. Patients and caregivers are not accurate in planning the future after surgery, using personal beliefs rather than referring to physicians, and not recognizing adequate resources. The medium-low competences' trend leads to unexpected critical situations, and patients could not deal with them in a maximally effective way. Both patients and caregivers should be taken over by healthcare professionals to improve patients' competences and make the curative surgery effective in daily life.

Indexed as

competenceshealthM.A.D.I.T. methodologyqualitative researchsurgerytext analysisupper GI–GI cancer

Identifiers

PMID35323396
PMCPMC8945744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.