ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022
Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Experience in the approach to adolescents with cancer in a multidisciplinary unit. Growing together.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying Barriers to Fertility Preservation in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
- Beyond Survival: Addressing Pediatric Oncofertility Risk, Preservation Methods, and Care Disparities.Pediatric annals · 2025Review
- Fertility preservation by ovarian tissue transportation and centralized cryobanking for a 20-year-old woman with Hodgkin lymphoma.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Fertility-Related Concerns in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Canadian Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers among women oncofertility in Iran: a cross-sectional study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and the Desire for Parenthood-A Legal View from a Swiss Perspective in Consideration of the Relevance of Cancer Support Organizations.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Shared Decision-Making About Future Fertility in Childhood Cancer Survivorship: Perspectives of Parents in Uganda.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2023Article
- Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Thoughts about fertility among female adolescents and young adults with cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Encapsulated Allografts Preclude Host Sensitization and Promote Ovarian Endocrine Function in Ovariectomized Young Rhesus Monkeys and Sensitized Mice.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Adolescent and young adult cancers: unmet needs and closing the gaps.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Oncofertility in pediatric patients: current perspectives.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High survival rates in adolescent cancer patients have shifted the medical focus to the long-term outcomes of cancer treatments. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation increase the risk of infertility and infertility-related distress in adolescent cancer patients and survivors. The aims of this narrative review were to (1) describe the psychosocial impacts of cancer-related infertility in adolescents, (2) identify multilevel barriers to fertility preservation (FP) conversations and referrals, and (3) conclude with evidence-based clinical solutions for improving the oncofertility support available to Canadian adolescents. The results of this review revealed that FP decisions occur within the patient, parent, and health care provider (HCP) triad, and are influenced by factors such as parent attitudes, patient maturity, and HCP knowledge. Decision tools and HCP education can promote the occurrence of developmentally appropriate fertility discussions. At the systems level, cost and resource barriers prevent patients from receiving sufficient fertility information and referrals. Clinical models of care (MOCs) can define interdisciplinary roles and referral pathways to improve the integration of oncofertility services into adolescent cancer care. The continued integration of oncofertility care will ensure that all Canadian adolescents receive the exemplary medical and psychological support necessary to make empowered decisions about their own fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.