Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323314›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Methods of Sentinel Lymph Node Detection and Management in Urinary Bladder Cancer-A Narrative Review.

Ankit Sinha, Alexander West, John Hayes, Jeremy Teoh, Karel Decaestecker, Nikhil Vasdev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Immunogenic Cell Death Role in Urothelial Cancer Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ankit SinhaHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1180-6574
Alexander WestHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, UK.
John HayesHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, UK.
Jeremy TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-2342
Karel DecaesteckerDepartment of Urology, University of Ghent Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage SG1 4AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-5734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDetection of lymph node status in bladder cancer significantly impacts clinical decisions regarding its management. There is a wide range of detection modalities for this task, including lymphoscintigraphy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and fluoroscopy. We aimed to study the pre- and intraoperative detection modalities of sentinel lymph nodes in urinary bladder cancer.

methodThis narrative review was performed by searching the PubMed and EMBASE libraries using the following search terms: ("Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder" OR "urothelial cancer" OR "urinary bladder cancer" OR "bladder cancer") AND (("sentinel lymph node") OR ("lymphatic mapping") OR ("lymphoscintigraphy") OR ("lymphangiography") OR ("lymph node metastases")). Studies analysing the effectiveness and outcomes of sentinel lymph node detection in bladder cancer were included, while non-English language, duplicates, and non-article studies were excluded. After analysing the libraries and a further manual search of bibliographies, 31 studies were included in this paper. We followed the RAMESES publication standard for narrative reviews to produce this paper.

resultsOf the 31 studies included, 7 studies included multiple detection methods; 5 studies included lymphoscintigraphy; 5 studies included computed tomography and/or single-photon emission computed tomography; 5 studies included fluoroscopy; 4 studies included magnetic resonance imaging; and 5 studies included positron emission tomography. DISCUSSION: Anatomical, radioactive, and functional detection modalities have been studied independently and in combination. The consensus is that preoperative detection with imaging helps guide surgical management and intraoperative detection methods help capture any lymph nodes that may have been missed. Each of these types of detection represent their own set of benefits and drawbacks, but there is currently limited evidence to support any change in overall practice to replace conventional staging.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellLymphadenopathySentinel Lymph NodeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphoscintigraphySentinel Lymph Node Biopsybladder cancerdetectionimagingPLNDsentinel lymph nodes

Identifiers

PMID35323314
PMCPMC8947662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.