Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323121›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

A Quality Improvement Emergency Department Surge Management Platform (SurgeCon): Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.

Hensley H Mariathas, Oliver Hurley, Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki, Christina Young, Christopher Patey, Paul Norman, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Peizhong Peter Wang, Veeresh Gadag, Hai V Nguyen and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04789902 (A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Designed to Evaluate the Effects of SurgeCon), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04789902 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Designed to Evaluate the Effects of SurgeCon: A Quality Improvement Surge Management Platform

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial University of NewfoundlandRan2021 to 2026Enrolled436,052ConditionsLength of Stay, Emergency DepartmentsArmsSurgeCon
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hensley H MariathasCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-4763
Oliver HurleyCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1989-7543
Nahid Rahimipour AnarakiCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1578-6494
Christina YoungCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-0324
Christopher PateyFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-2193
Paul NormanEastern Health, Carbonear Institute for Rural Reach and Innovation by the Sea, Carbonear General Hospital, Carbonear, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9734-5528
Kris Aubrey-BasslerFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-6838
Peizhong Peter WangFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-6861
Veeresh GadagDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1572-607X
Hai V NguyenSchool of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-170X
Holly EtchegaryFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-0726
Farah McCrateDepartment of Research and Innovation, Eastern Health, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-076X
John C KnightFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-7272
Shabnam AsghariCentre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-0978
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CASt. John’s Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite many efforts, long wait times and overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) have remained a significant health service issue in Canada. For several years, Canada has had one of the longest wait times among the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. From a patient's perspective, this challenge has been described as "patients wait in pain or discomfort for hours before being seen at EDs." To overcome the challenge of increased wait times, we developed an innovative ED management platform called SurgeCon that was designed based on continuous quality improvement principles to maintain patient flow and mitigate the impact of patient surge on ED efficiency. The SurgeCon quality improvement intervention includes a protocol-driven software platform, restructures ED organization and workflow, and aims to establish a more patient-centric environment. We piloted SurgeCon at an ED in Carbonear, Newfoundland and Labrador, and found that there was a 32% reduction in ED wait times.

objectiveThe primary objective of this trial is to determine the effects of SurgeCon on ED performance by assessing its impact on length of stay, the time to a physician's initial assessment, and the number of patients leaving the ED without being seen by a physician. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate SurgeCon's effects on patient satisfaction and patient-reported experiences with ED wait times and its ability to create better-value care by reducing the per-patient cost of delivering ED services.

methodsThe implementation of the intervention will be assessed using a comparative effectiveness-implementation hybrid design. This type of hybrid design is known to shorten the amount of time associated with transitioning interventions from being the focus of research to being used for practice and health care services. All EDs with 24/7 on-site physician support (category A hospitals) will be enrolled in a 31-month, pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. All clusters (hospitals) will start with a baseline period of usual care and will be randomized to determine the order and timing of transitioning to intervention care until all hospitals are using the intervention to manage and operationalize their EDs.

resultsData collection for this study is continuing. As of February 2022, a total of 570 randomly selected patients have participated in telephone interviews concerning patient-reported experiences and patient satisfaction with ED wait times. The first of the 4 EDs was randomly selected, and it is currently using SurgeCon's eHealth platform and applying efficiency principles that have been learned through training since September 2021. The second randomly selected site will begin intervention implementation in winter 2022.

conclusionsBy assessing the impact of SurgeCon on ED services, we hope to be able to improve wait times and create better-value ED care in this health care context.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04789902; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04789902. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30454.

Indexed as

cluster randomized trialsemergency departmentstepped wedge designSurgeConwait time

Identifiers

PMID35323121
PMCPMC8990381
OpenAlexW4206243370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.