ArticlemAbs
Suitability of transiently expressed antibodies for clinical studies: product quality consistency at different production scales.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-Culture Antibody Capture Using Transient CHO Expression Systems.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Differences in mAb Galactosylation Caused by the Leaching of Manganese Ions from Different Bioreactors.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Unique DNA impacts on transient Expi293Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- A Robust, High-Titer, Semi-Automated, and In-Culture Antibody-Capturing Transient CHO Platform Technology.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intensification of rAAV Production Based on HEK293 Cell Transient Transfection.Biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Investigating the impact of synonymous gene recoding on a recombinantly expressed monoclonal antibody under different process parameters.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
- Recombinant Protein Production from Stable CHO Cell Pools.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Exploring Parametric and Mechanistic Differences between Expi293FAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transgenic human monoclonal antibodies derived from humanized mice against different epitopes of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and chimeric llama-human bispecific heavy chain-only antibodies targeting the Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), were produced using a CHO-based transient expression system. Two lead candidates were assessed for each model virus before selecting and progressing one lead molecule. MERS-7.7G6 was used as the model antibody to demonstrate batch-to-batch process consistency and, together with RVFV-107-104, were scaled up to 200 L. Consistent expression titers were obtained in different batches at a 5 L scale for MERS-7.7G6. Although lower expression levels were observed for MERS-7.7G6 and RVFV-107-104 during scale up to 200 L, product quality attributes were consistent at different scales and in different batches. In addition to this, peptide mapping data suggested no detectable sequence variants for any of these candidates. Functional assays demonstrated comparable neutralizing activity for MERS-7.7G6 and RVFV-107-104 generated at different production scales. Similarly, MERS-7.7G6 batches generated at different scales were shown to provide comparable protection in mouse models. Our study demonstrates that a CHO-based transient expression process is capable of generating consistent product quality at different production scales and thereby supports the potential of using transient gene expression to accelerate the manufacturing of early clinical material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.