Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322783›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2022

The experiential perspectives of siblings and partners caring for a loved one with an eating disorder in the UK.

Rachel Batchelor, Hannah Cribben, Pamela Macdonald, Janet Treasure, Erica Cini, Dasha Nicholls, Carol Kan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sibling Involvement and Documentation in Pediatric Eating Disorder Care.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel BatchelorDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-2388
Hannah CribbenInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-8251
Pamela MacdonaldInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Janet TreasureInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Erica CiniEast London Eating Disorder Service for Children and Young People, East London NHS Foundation Trust, UK; and Nutrition Science Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-2379
Dasha NichollsDivision of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-6605
Carol KanInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
King's College London · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaring for a loved one with an eating disorder typically comes with a multitude of challenges, yet siblings and partners are often overlooked. It is important to understand if current clinical guidance for supporting carers are effective and being utilised for these groups, to help meet their needs.

aimsTo identify the experiential perspectives of siblings and partners of a loved one with an eating disorder compared with guidance for improving the adequacy of support provided to carers published by Beat and Academy for Eating Disorders.

methodThree online focus groups were held for ten siblings and five partners from across the UK (12 females and three males). Carers had experience of caring for a loved one with anorexia nervosa (13 carers) or bulimia nervosa (two carers), across a range of therapeutic settings. Focus group transcriptions were analysed with thematic analysis.

resultsFour key themes were identified: (a) role-specific needs, (b) challenges encountered by siblings and partners, (c) generic needs and helpful strategies or approaches, and (d) accounts of service provision and family support.

conclusionsOverall, the majority of experiences reported by siblings and partners did not meet the published guidance. Consequently, clinical practice recommendations were identified for services, alongside the charity sector, to take a proactive approach in detecting difficulties, providing skills training and emotional/practical support, adapting/tailoring peer support groups and supporting online facilitation. Our findings part-informed the design of our national online survey on loved ones' experiences of care in eating disorders.

Indexed as

carersEating disorderspartnersservice provisionsiblings

Identifiers

PMID35322783
PMCPMC9059625
OpenAlexW4221111441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.