Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322668›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Information Extraction From Electronic Health Records to Predict Readmission Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Does Natural Language Processing Using Clinical Notes Improve Prediction of Readmission?

Jeremiah R Brown, Iben M Ricket, Ruth M Reeves, Rashmee U Shah, Christine A Goodrich, Glen Gobbel, Meagan E Stabler, Amy M Perkins, Freneka Minter, Kevin C Cox and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Cardiology.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jeremiah R BrownDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.
Iben M RicketDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.ORCID 0000-0002-9486-5747
Ruth M ReevesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
Rashmee U ShahDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT.
Christine A GoodrichDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.
Glen GobbelDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
Meagan E StablerDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.
Amy M PerkinsGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Care Center Tennessee Valley Healthcare System VA Nashville TN.
Freneka MinterDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-2704
Kevin C CoxDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.
Chad DornDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.ORCID 0000-0002-4886-6159
Jason DentonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
Bruce E BrayDivision of General Internal Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
Ramkiran GouripeddiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-9669
John HigginsDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.
Wendy W ChapmanCentre for Digital Transformation of Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Todd MacKenzieDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Hanover NH.
Michael E MathenyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Information Extraction from EMRs to Predict Readmission following Acute Myocardial InfarctionR01HL130828 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BROWN, JEREMIAH R, MATHENY, MICHAEL E. · 2016 to 2019
$3.1M
Improving Cardiovascular Drug Safety With Automated Bleeding ClassificationK08HL136850 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SHAH, RASHMEE U. · 2017 to 2020
$652k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL136850NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Social risk factors influence rehospitalization rates yet are challenging to incorporate into prediction models. Integration of social risk factors using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning could improve risk prediction of 30-day readmission following an acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Patients were enrolled into derivation and validation cohorts. The derivation cohort included inpatient discharges from Vanderbilt University Medical Center between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016, with a primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, who were discharged alive, and not transferred from another facility. The validation cohort included patients from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health Center between April 2, 2011, and December 31, 2016, meeting the same eligibility criteria described above. Data from both sites were linked to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrative data to supplement 30-day hospital readmissions. Clinical notes from each cohort were extracted, and an NLP model was deployed, counting mentions of 7 social risk factors. Five machine learning models were run using clinical and NLP-derived variables. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed, and receiver operating characteristic comparison analyses were performed. The 30-day rehospitalization rates among the derivation (n=6165) and validation (n=4024) cohorts were 15.1% (n=934) and 10.2% (n=412), respectively. The derivation models demonstrated no statistical improvement in model performance with the addition of the selected NLP-derived social risk factors. Conclusions Social risk factors extracted using NLP did not significantly improve 30-day readmission prediction among hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction. Alternative methods are needed to capture social risk factors.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionNatural Language ProcessingAgedElectronic Health RecordsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedicarePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesUnited Stateselectronic health recordsmachine learningmyocardial infarctionnatural language processingpatient readmission

Identifiers

PMID35322668
PMCPMC9075435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.