Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322585›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2022

Uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic-based population of women with breast cancer.

Alexandra Wehbe, Mark Manning, Hadeel Assad, Kristen S Purrington, Michael S Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra WehbeWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9297-9786
Mark ManningPopulation Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Hadeel AssadPopulation Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1869-0199
Kristen S PurringtonPopulation Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-1692
Michael S SimonPopulation Studies and Disparities Research Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3237-6761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study was conducted to evaluate racial differences in referral and uptake of genetic counseling (GC) in a clinic-based population of women with breast cancer.

methodsMedical records of 150 breast cancer patients at the Karmanos Cancer Institute were reviewed to determine eligibility for GC according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, GC referral rates, and appointment completion rates. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between demographic and clinical factors and GC eligibility and referral.

resultsThe mean age at diagnosis was 57.1 (SD 12.6) and 66% of the women were Black. There were 91 women (60.7%) eligible for GC and of those, 54 (61.4%) were referred. After multivariable analyses, factors associated with reduced eligibility were older age at diagnosis (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.87,0.95]) and Black race (OR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.15, 0.96]). After additional multivariable analysis, eligibility was associated with an increased likelihood of referral (OR = 5.97, 95% CI [2.29, 15.56]), however, Medicare versus private insurance was associated with a lower likelihood for referral (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.12-0.80]. Of those referred, 49 (76.6%) completed an appointment, and 47 had genetic testing. Women with Medicare were also less likely to complete an appointment. Race had no impact on referral or appointment completion.

conclusionsThere were no racial differences in GC referral or appointment completion in a clinic-based sample of women with breast cancer. Further interventions are needed to promote increased referral and appointment completion for women with breast cancer who are eligible for GC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic CounselingAgedFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMedicareReferral and ConsultationUnited Statesbreast cancergenetic counselinggenetic testinghealth care disparitieshereditary cancer syndromes

Identifiers

PMID35322585
PMCPMC9468430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.