Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322564›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2022

Automated artificial intelligence-based system for clinical follow-up of patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Ivan Potapenko, Bo Thiesson, Mads Kristensen, Javad Nouri Hajari, Tomas Ilginis, Josefine Fuchs, Steffen Hamann, Morten la Cour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Managing Patient Demand in a Value-Based System.Annals of family medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivan PotapenkoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-655X
Bo ThiessonEnversion A/S, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mads KristensenEnversion A/S, Aarhus, Denmark.
Javad Nouri HajariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tomas IlginisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Josefine FuchsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steffen HamannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten la CourDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Center for Regional Development, Capital Region Denmark 18004092Center for Regional Development, Capital Region Denmark 19030674Helsefonden 20-B-0099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we investigate the potential of a novel artificial intelligence-based system for autonomous follow-up of patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

methodsA temporal deep learning model was trained on a data set of 84 489 optical coherence tomography scans from AMD patients to recognize disease activity, and its performance was compared with a published non-temporal model trained on the same data (Acta Ophthalmol, 2021). An autonomous follow-up system was created by augmenting the AI model with deterministic logic to suggest treatment according to the observe-and-plan regimen. To validate the AI-based system, a data set comprising clinical decisions and imaging data from 200 follow-up consultations was collected prospectively. In each case, both the autonomous AI decision and original clinical decision were compared with an expert panel consensus.

resultsThe temporal AI model proved superior at detecting disease activity compared with the model without temporal input (area under the curve 0.900 (95% CI 0.894-0.906) and 0.857 (95% CI 0.846-0.867) respectively). The AI-based follow-up system could make an autonomous decision in 73% of the cases, 91.8% of which were in agreement with expert consensus. This was on par with the 87.7% agreement rate between decisions made in the clinic and expert consensus (p = 0.33).

conclusionsThe proposed autonomous follow-up system was shown to be safe and compliant with expert consensus on par with clinical practice. The system could in the future ease the pressure on public ophthalmology services from an increasing number of AMD patients.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationWet Macular DegenerationArtificial IntelligenceConsensusFollow-Up StudiesHumansTomography, Optical Coherenceage-related macular degenerationanti-vegfartificial intelligencefollow-up

Identifiers

PMID35322564
PMCPMC9790353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.