Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322456›Full record

ReviewHistopathology2022

Developing consensus in Histopathology: the role of the Delphi method.

Dilek Taze, Collette Hartley, Ann W Morgan, Aruna Chakrabarty, Sarah L Mackie, Kathryn J Griffin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Building the future of public health in Canada: A modified Delphi survey for updated core competencies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Evaluation of Rural Outdoor Dining Environment from Consumer Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Establishment of Thoracic Surgical Difficulty Assessment Scale based on Delphi method.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dilek TazeSt James' University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-5365
Collette HartleyLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ann W MorganSt James' University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Aruna ChakrabartySt James' University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Sarah L MackieNIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Kathryn J GriffinSt James' University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Leeds Hospital Charitable Foundation A2001317Medical Research Council MR/N011775/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Delphi method is a well-established research tool, used for consensus building across a number of fields. Despite its widespread use, and popularity in many medical specialities, there is a paucity of literature on the use of the Delphi method in Histopathology. This literature review seeks to critique the Delphi methodology and explore its potential applications to histopathology-based clinical and research questions. We review those published studies that have utilized the Delphi methodology in Histopathology settings and specifically outline the advantages and limitations of this technique, highlighting situations where its application can be most effective.

Indexed as

ConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesconsensusDelphihistopathology

Identifiers

PMID35322456
PMCPMC9541891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.